NZTailender
I can't believe I ate the whole thing
oh ffs
i don't mean it how it sounded - I can just see him being a league man rather than a union manoh ffs
The great man will never be replacedHaha, I appreciate Mixmasterreece dropping in here occasionally, but I wish he could replace that Bevan Congdon avatar itbt. The connotation between the avatar and the posting is just all wrong.
I missed the first round which puts me out of the running - I also have only placed tips once in the entire competition and certain teams (Otago) are playing horribly while others (Canterbury) are playing unbelievably.Haha i haven't placed a tip since second round xD.
Which is why he made no comment.Aaaaaand as usual you have no actual clue of why he's pulled himself out.
I honestly thought that the term "no comment" was self-explanatory enough that people would not need an interpreter to understand its meaning.Aaaaaand as usual you have no actual clue of why he's pulled himself out.
I took it to mean you taking a dig at him over repeated behavior that you've previously said means you wouldn't consider him for selection. That's how it came across if you recall your previous points about him.I honestly thought that the term "no comment" was self-explanatory enough that people would not need an interpreter to understand its meaning.
It means I am not making a judgement on the situation. Because I do not know what has happened.
Please let me know if you need further explanation of common phrases.
Would you afford everyone this sort of leniency? Let's say Ross pulls out of a Test tour, can we trust that you'll reserve judgement and not label it a lazy decision by a cricketer who doesn't put his country first?Aaaaaand as usual you have no actual clue of why he's pulled himself out.
Yes. Especially Ross. I'll still say he is a lazy cricketer. I'll still say he should've put his team first but I'd realise that we don't have enough players of Ross' callibre to be able to drop him or not take him for selection.Would you afford everyone this sort of leniency? Let's say Ross pulls out of a Test tour, can we trust that you'll reserve judgement and not label it a lazy decision by a cricketer who doesn't put his country first?
There'd want to be a very good reason. This sideshow does not need to wind into 2015 and nearer the World Cup.
You'll note I said "subtext" and "seems to relate" and quoted "Stuff" not "People who have already posted here" - give it two to three days and "He had a punch up" or "He was drunk" will come out of posters here. Guarantee it.Noone on here is making assumptions.
That's the reality of Ryder - he's newsworthy so he'll get constant attention on anything related to him being in the NZ side. NZ'ers in general also don't deal well with talented enfant terribles like Jesse Ryder is, because of the tall poppy syndrome and the misguided principle that "culture comes first, winning comes second" that is firmly ensconsed in the nation.Inb4 Blocky quotes the first few responses on CW to the initial news article as evidence of an anti-Ryder and fairness contingent.
Yeah, na. People may have responded with assumptions but it was due to the sensationalistic news that dogs Ryder, and irregardless of the reason he is missing the A tour. This is still a big set back for his WC chances and is frustrating for everyone who would like him to be in the setup.