• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

**Official** Pakistan v New Zealand in the UAE 2014

WindieWeathers

International Regular
Also let me say that the stick Blocky is getting is oh so typical. When anyone has the nerve to think for themselves it's frowned upon and the pack mentality kicks in...no-one is saying you have to agree with the guy..hell during the WI/NZ series much of what he was saying i simply couldn't stomach..but i didn't get abusive towards the guy did i? and start calling him "troll" and this kind of school kid nonsense!!.. 8-) ..some posters need to just chill out and not get too emotionally caught up, cause it really doesn't add anything positive to the forum or the debates.
 

Blocky

Banned
I'm on mobile so i'll get a proper reply in later but few things:
1) only 2 ppl in this thread have claimed Astle has more potential than Sodhi, I don't know how that makes up 'most' of the nz fans. Anyways Astle is 28; he's past the 'young lad with potential' stage.
2) the fact that you bring up stats shows that you clearly didn't watch the match
3) better performance isn't indicative of more potential; a former FC cricketer should know this
4) where is the proof that you are an FC cricketer btw?
Only two people...? Are you blind? So far the only person who seems absolutely certain that Sodhi is the best spin bowler we have is Howsie. The rest are all pretty much of the opinion that Tastle is better. Tastle has a stupidly strong following considering how **** he is as a player..

Better performance over 100 wickets is indicative that you're a better performer. If you're that good of a performer but can't out perform your peers in any format, then you're not that good of a performer, basically.

I don't need to prove anything, you can take me at face value or you can play haterade about it - the fact remains, I'm here to debate cricket and laugh at people like you who get offended when I dare say Taylor is a lazy trainer.
 

cnerd123

likes this
Only two people...? Are you blind? So far the only person who seems absolutely certain that Sodhi is the best spin bowler we have is Howsie. The rest are all pretty much of the opinion that Tastle is better. Tastle has a stupidly strong following considering how **** he is as a player..

Better performance over 100 wickets is indicative that you're a better performer. If you're that good of a performer but can't out perform your peers in any format, then you're not that good of a performer, basically.

I don't need to prove anything, you can take me at face value or you can play haterade about it - the fact remains, I'm here to debate cricket and laugh at people like you who get offended when I dare say Taylor is a lazy trainer.
I see you use the word performance but not the word potential...please reread my posts carefully
 

Howsie

International Captain
Typical Howsie amateur hour debating attempts - "Even though I know you'll refute my opinion with a pretty reasonable statement, I'm going to say upfront that you'll refute my opinion so I can call back to it and say Well ain't that a bunch of bull****. "

He took his first wicket at 6 for 59. It's perfectly valid to say Sodhi didn't bowl his side to victory, he didn't even matter until the game was a forgone conclusion. But sure, "They all had a bunch of centuries, and because of rain, and because of " - You're a Sodhi apologist.

As for Wagner, he'll play even out of form and still out perform what Southee, Boult, Sodhi and Craig did in this test.

This isn't amateur hour debating squad, stating "Well I guess you'll completely refute my point even after I make it" doesn't absolve you of the fact that your point is entirely refutable. If your first w
Please. When it comes to Sodhi you're completely irrational. Unless Sodhi bowls the perfect leg break the wicket doesn't count, it was simply down to an 'error' by the batsman (and this coming from a Neil Wagner fan no less). Two pages back you then state had Watling been better behind the stumps you could argue Craig was better than Sodhi, WHAT. So Craig can pick up wickets with batsman charging down the pitch looking to slog him out of the attack, or batsman playing reverse sweeps etc but Sodhi can't? Explain that one for me. Why in the world would they count for Craig but not Sodhi?

Surely this type of reasoning doesn't have anything to do with a strong bias against him
 
Last edited:

Nate

You'll Never Walk Alone
Blocky = WindieWeathers #nailedit #fivestars

So how about ISIS guys? Some pretty nasty stuff going down in Iraq.
 

Athlai

Not Terrible
Only two people...? Are you blind? So far the only person who seems absolutely certain that Sodhi is the best spin bowler we have is Howsie. The rest are all pretty much of the opinion that Tastle is better. Tastle has a stupidly strong following considering how **** he is as a player..
Uh? Very few people earnestly want Tastle in the team, and the most vocal who do are Australian. Most Kiwis are of the opinion that we have no good spinners and reluctantly concede Sodhi is probably our best bet.
 

Howsie

International Captain
Only two people...? Are you blind? So far the only person who seems absolutely certain that Sodhi is the best spin bowler we have is Howsie. The rest are all pretty much of the opinion that Tastle is better. Tastle has a stupidly strong following considering how **** he is as a player..

I don't need to prove anything,
I am? Thanks for telling me that I suppose...

And yeah you do. If you wanna play the 'I've got connections', 'I've played cricket with', 'I've got inside knowledge' be prepared to be called out, especially when you use it as part of your debate.
 

WindieWeathers

International Regular
Blocky = WindieWeathers #nailedit #fivestars

So how about ISIS guys? Some pretty nasty stuff going down in Iraq.
Not a chance in hell and the mods are more than welcome to check the IP addresses if they wish.

I've been victimised on this forum myself which is the only reason why i defended the guy a little bit...
 

Jono

Virat Kohli (c)
Pakistan should win the toss in the next test and bowl first to shut everyone up.

Need to also win of course.
 

Jono

Virat Kohli (c)
Pakistan should win the toss in the next test and bowl first to shut everyone up.

Need to also win of course.
Actually the minute they choose to bowl first there will be a match fixing investigation so let's not do this Misbah :ph34r:
 

Dan

Hall of Fame Member
Uh? Very few people earnestly want Tastle in the team, and the most vocal who do are Australian. Most Kiwis are of the opinion that we have no good spinners and reluctantly concede Sodhi is probably our best bet.
Hey, I support NZ cricket more than I do the Australian side these days! Don't just play my nationality :'(

FTR Blocky, I argue for Tastle to open the batting since we've got literally no decent non-Latham options, and provide a pie-throwing spin option so both Neesham and Anderson can play (since, as I'm sure you'd agree, Neesham is crazily talented and deserves his spot yet Anderson is ahead of him on performance right here, right now). Basically, why pick two **** players when you can pick one **** player and have him play both roles?

Astle, Latham, Williamson, Taylor, McCullum, Anderson, Watling, Neesham, Southee, Wagner, Boult.
 

Athlai

Not Terrible
Hey, I support NZ cricket more than I do the Australian side these days! Don't just play my nationality :'(

FTR Blocky, I argue for Tastle to open the batting since we've got literally no decent non-Latham options, and provide a pie-throwing spin option so both Neesham and Anderson can play (since, as I'm sure you'd agree, Neesham is crazily talented and deserves his spot yet Anderson is ahead of him on performance right here, right now). Basically, why pick two **** players when you can pick one **** player and have him play both roles?

Astle, Latham, Williamson, Taylor, McCullum, Anderson, Watling, Neesham, Southee, Wagner, Boult.
Your support of Astle and not Guptill for opener means you aren't a part of #teamathlai
 

Dan

Hall of Fame Member
As for the questions a couple of pages back regarding moderation, start a thread in Site Discussion and we can have the conversation there. A tour thread isn't the place for debating mod processes and procedures.

Anyway, I'm going back to spending my day watching trashy TV because I'm done with uni for the year. Try not to kill each other (or get banned) while I'm gone.
 

Dan

Hall of Fame Member
Your support of Astle and not Guptill for opener means you aren't a part of #teamathlai
You thinking Jeet Raval is a myth means you aren't a part of #teamdan. And 9 out of 10 experts want to be on #teamdan.


*They may or may not have been paid for that statement
 

Athlai

Not Terrible
Sounds like a made up team, anything based on a mythical creature like Jeet Raval is highly unlikely to be authentic.
 

Top