• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Pakistan v Australia in UAE 2014

Agent Nationaux

International Coach
Don't judge Australia just yet. They haven't even had a bat on this road. Judge them once they have had their first innings. And if Hafeez can score here, anyone can.
 

GotSpin

Hall of Fame Member
Don't judge Australia just yet. They haven't even had a bat on this road. Judge them once they have had their first innings. And if Hafeez can score here, anyone can.
Nah, odds on we are for in for a definite rooting.

Just not really sure what the team has Been doing between the 200 odd days of test cricket. The prep Was clearly hopeless.
 

SteveNZ

Cricketer Of The Year


Michael Clarke’s funky field setting ‘against spirit of cricket’, says Allan Border

I don't see the problem - used this position in Super International Cricket all the time :ph34r: This it was called "Straight Net"
You've lost the plot when this is being implemented at 86-1. 350-2 yeah maybe, but Clarke/Boof were preaching strong plans pre-test. Were they deemed unsuccessful after 25 overs or was this rubbish always part of it?

Totally against the spirit of the game. The area behind the arm belongs to the batsmen. If England had got to this before them on last years tour, can you imagine the uproar? Poor form Michael Clarke
 

Spark

Global Moderator
You've lost the plot when this is being implemented at 86-1. 350-2 yeah maybe, but Clarke/Boof were preaching strong plans pre-test. Were they deemed unsuccessful after 25 overs or was this rubbish always part of it?

Totally against the spirit of the game. The area behind the arm belongs to the batsmen. If England had got to this before them on last years tour, can you imagine the uproar? Poor form Michael Clarke
...of all the things to get exercised over, you pick this?
 

SteveNZ

Cricketer Of The Year
...of all the things to get exercised over, you pick this?
If by exercised you mean worked up, it's rubbish. Don't try and pretend you've turned the corner as a cricketing nation under a brave new leader when you get down 1-0 in a series, make two suspect changes then get to 80-1 and stick a bloody man behind the bowlers arm.

Granted I didn't see the previous 26 overs but he wasn't there as a catcher was he? He was there under an approach of 'okay, we've got little or no idea how to get you out, so we'll stick a man in your line of sight and see if that'll harm you watching the ball'

Never mind setting better fields, building pressure, picking someone in your squad that is actually capable of doing that.

Australia have a stated aim of being #1 in the world. I'm sure there are more sustainable ways of becoming that side than adopting a tactic that is an equivalent of sneezing in someone's backswing on the 18th hole
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Granted I didn't see the previous 26 overs
Clearly.

I mean, generally speaking, if a fielder is positioned somewhere that's because the batsman is hitting (or might hit) the ball in that direction and the captain wants to stop him getting a run from it. Just a thought.

This is, quite seriously, one of the most trivial complaints I have seen in a cricketing context in a long while.
 
Last edited:

GotSpin

Hall of Fame Member
Since you just admitted to not watching I dont see how you can comment on it to be honest.

The idea Was to ensure that the batsmen couldnt score runs straight and would therefore need to play across the line
 

Top