• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Average players suddenly becoming very good

weldone

Hall of Fame Member
I feel like this thread is meant for players who appeared to be distinctly unimpressive both in potential AND performance before finding a spark out of nowhere, which Harris is the poster boy for.

A 6 foot something left armer capable of bowling 150kph doesn't fit that bill in any sense.
Nailed it

Yes, among the bowlers today, Ryan Harris is the most suitable candidate by far.
 

ohnoitsyou

International Regular
Surprised theres been no mention of Ian O'Brien, not in the Harris class for sure, but he was very very good on his second wind
 

watson

Banned
After 26 Test matches Steve Waugh had a mediocre Batting Average of 30.52, had scored zero centuries, and was known as "Waugh what is he good for?"

Contrast that with Wayne Phillips who was sacked after 27 Tests despite being a more talented batsman, averaging 32.28 with 2 centuries, and being stuck with the wicket keeping duties.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Faf du Plessis. He was a pretty average First Class cricketer until he was about 27; he'd always been a good domestic one day cricketer but his initial Test squad selection when he was 28 was only really based on one good season and he took to it like a duck to water.

To a lesser extent but in a similar way, Jonathan Trott. He'd always been a good county cricketer, but a thoroughly inconsistent one in the four day game (including occasional droppings from the team), not considered a serious Test cricket contender right up until his breakout season when he was 28. Then he had an absolutely golden run in Test cricket than few would have predicted.
 
Last edited:

Valer

First Class Debutant
On Faf / Trott / Harris

Is it fair to lump those without a test career with those who have actually played tests and not done very well?

Btw, this run he's on has to be the most devastating string of performances I've ever seen. 74 wickets in 12 tests... jeez
Surprisingly it includes Delhi 2013 where he went wicket-less.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
I think not even being good enough to be selected in the first place makes the transformation even more impressive.
 

Lillian Thomson

Hall of Fame Member
Graham Gooch was dropped after two Tests in 1975 and then after being recalled in 1978 took another three summers to make his first century after 20+ Tests. There were serious discussions on Test Match Special about his long term prospects. One of his chief supporters was Fred Truman, though years later Sir Fred also backed John Crawley to come good in the same way that Gooch eventually did.
 

GGG

State Captain
Nah, Harris was absolute gun in ODI cricket from 1996 to about 2000. Statsguru that ****.
I didn't know his overall statistics are as bad as they are, he was a much better ODI player than they suggest that is for sure. I would go as far as saying if he was still around he would fetch a heck of a lot playing in the IPL, perhaps as much as anyone.
 

sledger

Spanish_Vicente
Not that Kallis was ever average per se, but I've felt for some time that he ended up becoming better than was generally envisaged.
 

BeeGee

International Captain
Mark Richardson.

He went from being a very ordinary domestic spin bowler who batted at 10 and wasn't within a million miles of national selection, to being a top class test opening batsman.
 

Top