• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Ajmal Action Reported

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
If Migara is simply suggesting that we randomly test some (but certainly not all) bowlers who don't get reported in any addition to those who do get reported to establish somewhat of a control, then I actually agree with him 100%.

I think people may be dismissing what he's said a little too eagerly because he's been abrasive and tin-foil-hat-ish about this issue in the past. He's suggesting something very sensible here.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
The major issue I see with that is that there seen to be, like, two places in the whole world that do the sort of biomechanical testing necessary, and even a sporadic selection might overload then, but yeah, I agree
 

Agent Nationaux

International Coach
I would like to see Burgey tested since he has clearly violated the 15 word limit on rants.

I would also like to see those who don't rant as much and are within the 15 word limit, tested to see what that throws up.

I also think Watson is a secret ranter since he does not want everyone tested.
 

wellAlbidarned

International Coach
Well since Ajmal was tested under the old system and was fine, and now has been tested again and is not fine, it's not unreasonable to suggest the new system should at least be tested on at least one guy who, for all intents and purposes, has a textbook action.

He can go and get ****ed with the straight line crap though.
Because basic geometry and logic totally makes this necessary? Ok.
 

watson

Banned
If Migara is simply suggesting that we randomly test some (but certainly not all) bowlers who don't get reported in any addition to those who do get reported to establish somewhat of a control, then I actually agree with him 100%.

I think people may be dismissing what he's said a little too eagerly because he's been abrasive and tin-foil-hat-ish about this issue in the past. He's suggesting something very sensible here.
It does seem a shame though that we had to endure avagadro's number of pages before we finally arrived at a suitable destination - ie. something sensible.
 

watson

Banned
:laugh:

Avagadro's number is the number of atoms in about one grams worth of atoms. This is roughly equivalent to the number of oxygen molecules inhaled during a deep breath, or the number of stars in the known Universe.

It's a beautiful number.
 

Agent Nationaux

International Coach
It's very typical of Smelly to make an extremely offensive joke and then insert a Smiley as if to say don't worry I was only joking.

He has done it before many times.
 

Top