In what way? Because he was who you thought I should go for?God that's funny.
I'll take Stan McCabe but only if Monk is happy with the obvious resultant option.
Because starting at Ian Johnson and nearly arriving at Harold Larwood was a lot like this Chevy Chase scene......In what way? Because he was who you thought I should go for?
I think that you're being a bit 'glass half empty'. The only iffy player in that lineup is Amir which is not bad because everyone has an iffy player in their lineup. I've got George Thompson for example.Ending up at the bottom of a round like this is absolutely ****ed. No choice at all now. I'm going to hate my own team.
Yup. He got Tendulkar out of your grasp thoughI think that you're being a bit 'glass half empty'. The only iffy player in that lineup is Amir which is not bad because everyone has an iffy player in their lineup. I've got George Thompson for example.
1. Hutton
2. Rowe
3. Hammond
4. Tendulkar
5. Kallis
6. De Villiers
7.
8. Lindwall
9. Turner
10. Amir
11. O'Reilly
Maclaren has a HS of 120 at No.5, so I don't think his position in the order is an issue. IMO most openers can bat anywhere, it's the other way around that is more of a problem.Bonjour watson! Saw your message just now, I guess I had gone to bed few minutes before.
Needed a batsman so it was J or H. From the looks of it I'll be getting Archie Maclaren. I already have two openers so I guess he'd be going into the middle order. Not sure how he'd be received in that position, from what I read he was tactically very astute and adaptable so I presume it won't be a big issue.