Shri
Mr. Glass
Guess they would have added ***ual harassment to the charges if that were the case.was it a pat on the bum?
Guess they would have added ***ual harassment to the charges if that were the case.was it a pat on the bum?
The reason it didn't leak is apparently the ICC lawyer told the two teams to bang their heads together and sort it out between them. It appears Dhoni (or maybe Fletch) decided they still wanted to press ahead with a charge which is why it's been delayed.The fact that England have put in a counter claim means this next test is going to be played in such a great spirit.
If there was an incident on day 2 surely it would have leaked out during the test the way everything does these days. Expect there to be an investigation in which no evidence is given and both teams are told to grow up.
There is no history of Dhoni making up charges to get a player banned.Sorry but England launching a counter claim straight away does make me think this is six of one half a dozen of the other
If there's evidence to the contrary I'll happily criticise Jimmy
I don't see the relevance of something Dhoni did three years ago. Might as well bring up the time he claimed KP on the bounce to the contrary as a counter if we want to look at whether he would do something unsporting?
Meh, wait and see I guess
Like I say, that history includes claiming a bounce catchThere is no history of Dhoni making up charges to get a player banned.
There is history of him being very sporting to the English cricket team.
Considering there is little detail, jumping to the first conclusion is far more ridiculous than relying on the fact that Dhoni previously played the game in good spirit and is unlikely to be doing something seriously seriously unethical.
Wouldn't surprise me. Tendulkar was always a soft ****Maybe I'm not remembering this correctly, but in 2011 wasn't Bell recalled by Dhoni at the behest of Tendulkar? Was reported at the time, at least.
He's the worst cricket journalist around.Michael Vaughan is trying to take this to another level, I never knew he was such an attention seeker, talks rubbish most of the time.
This one is a really funny piece from Andrew Hughes.
Blogs: Andrew Hughes: The Michael Vaughan challenge | Cricket Blogs | ESPN Cricinfo
And this one aswell,
Blogs: Andrew Hughes: Spare us the Vaughany | Cricket Blogs | ESPN Cricinfo
Has been since he retired. Ultimate drama queen/troll.Michael Vaughan is trying to take this to another level, I never knew he was such an attention seeker, talks rubbish most of the time.
This one is a really funny piece from Andrew Hughes.
Blogs: Andrew Hughes: The Michael Vaughan challenge | Cricket Blogs | ESPN Cricinfo
And this one aswell,
Blogs: Andrew Hughes: Spare us the Vaughany | Cricket Blogs | ESPN Cricinfo
Give over mate. He's also the bloke who claimed a catch off Pietersen the tour before that which bounced about a foot and a half in front of him*. What he did three years ago is about as relevant as that.The same captain who called Bell back at Trent Bridge when he was run out in 2011 is now making up the seriousness of the incident to have Anderson banned in like 3 tests time.
But all this post does is illustrate the point you can't hand pick what a bloke has done in the past to determine what they're doing now, in the absence of some other evidence. Yesterday I went and saw a young bloke in Silverwater. The cops would draw attention to his juvenile conviction for a serious assault, I would draw attention to his acquittal for something similar as an adult. Neither is relevant to whether he committed the murder he's charged with.Even if you include claiming the bounce catch, I can name other captains to have done it. Michael Clarke. Mahela Jayawardene. Sourav Ganguly.
None of them to my knowledge have made up that a player has done something they didn't to have them banned and not be able to play.
Its a serious allegation, and Cook is going to have to look Dhoni in the eye and shake his hand at Lord's whilst having basically said publicly in the media that Dhoni is a cheat.
If you say Dhoni is overreacting and having a wahhh I can cop that. Could be true. To say he's making this up or exaggerating it to get Anderson banned without any evidence is extremely bold.
Yeah but Broad is as likely to go missing for three tests now. That's his way, he drifts in and out if series a bit.Know it was only one match and not typical swinging conditions but Broad was an absolute country mile better than any other bowler on either side in Trent Bridge and I find it hard to believe that Anderson can suddenly become the best English bowler by far if conditions are more favourable to the James Anderson style of bowling.
tl;dr - Stuart Broad is a ****ing gun. :
Mark Ilott or Mark Ealham spring to mind. Back to 93 we goIf Anderson does end up missing matches because of this, I have no idea who should replace him. Usually Onions would be the obvious call, but he hasn't struck me as being fit and in form this year. Finn's recovery is still a WIP. Jordan is very much a 3rd or 4th seamer. Sidebottom's about 40. Who else is there?
Heh.Why don't they just sort it our round the back of the pavilion after the ............