-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
***Official*** India in England 2014
- Thread starter Daemon
- Start date
Burgey
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Burgey
Request Your Custom Title Now!
honestbharani
Whatever it takes!!!
Match Point : Eng v Ind, 1st Investec Test, Trent Bridge, 3rd day | Chappell: Dhoni should not have appealed against Prior | Cricket videos, MP3, podcasts, cricket audio | ESPN Cricinfo
That's an 'interesting' point of view. That type of **** should be brought up though when a batsman gets lampooned for not walking.
That's an 'interesting' point of view. That type of **** should be brought up though when a batsman gets lampooned for not walking.
LegionOfBrad
International Debutant
From memory it looked like the bowler barely appealed. Dharmasena must be very annoyed at the lack of DRS this series. It'd have got reviewed, reversed and no one would have talked about it again.
viriya
International Captain
He made one bad decision, unfair imo. He also had the balls to give Broad out after that.
Yeah probably is unfair, but his 3rd man antics can hardly just be brushed over can they. He was also bad on the field in our home Ashes series.
Burgey
Request Your Custom Title Now!
He's the ump who never looks for a front foot no ball isn't he?
Adders
Cricketer Of The Year
The same epiphany dawned on me this morning too Pothas.
Teja.
Global Moderator
You have to start worrying about Anderson and especially Broad being overworked. This is a five test series and in the first three days, they've already bowled 35+ overs each on an extremely unforgiving surface and have done a fair amount of batting as well with a lot more bowling to come in the next day or two.
BoyBrumby
Englishman
What I loathe (aside from shyteness) is that one can't really see what the end game with this team is supposed to be.
If we are rebuilding and the phrase is supposed to be anything but a euphemism for "more that faintly turd", why are we playing three specialist seamers, a batting all-rounder at eight, no specialist spinner and a thirty-two year old keeper who's out of form and increasingly injury and bollock prone?
Looks more a "paper the cracks" phase than a "transitional" one to me.
Quite so.
God love the beard, but he's not a test spinner's arsehole and Cook clearly doesn't trust him. With some justification.
I hate to indulge in the facile "if one removes a player's best performance they look rubbish" fallacy, but as good as his undefeated ton was, all of his actual test dismissals look a little ordinary too.