Even if he retired tomorrow I think I'd have de Villiers down as the better batsman of the two - with the gloves or without. Gilchrist was just such a better gloveman though that de Villiers would really have to improve in that area; he'd probably find his way into the side on batting alone before he offered a better batting+keeping package than Gilchrist at his standard level of glovework.I was thinking about this today; At what point do we start having ABDv as a legitimate candidate to replace Gilchirst in the keeper-batsman role in a world XI? I think he's a lot more versatile batsman than Gilchrist and is somebody I like more coming in at No.6 regardless of whether the score is 60/4 or 385/4. Based on seeing them both play, I think he's also more likely to have success against high quality bowling in a variety of conditions. He averages 57 over 21 tests as the designated keeper and most of it has been against a high standard of opposition. Thoughts?
That's interesting. If ABdV goes down as the best bat of the Clarke-KP-Amla era but just outside Hammond-Hobbs-Sachin etc., you'd still Gilchrist for his superior keeping?Even if he retired tomorrow I think I'd have de Villiers down as the better batsman of the two - with the gloves or without. Gilchrist was just such a better gloveman though that de Villiers would really have to improve in that area; he'd probably find his way into the side on batting alone before he offered a better batting+keeping package than Gilchrist at his standard level of glovework.
I actually regard Andy Flower as a better batsman than Gilchrist but leave him out for similar reasons. Gilchrist's glove-work tends to be really under-rated in these discussions for some reason.
I agree really. I just don't think de Villiers's glovework would really cut it at that level either. I think what you rate higher than me is de Villiers's keeping.I think he'd be one of the bats who'd suffer the most disproportionately from a hypothetical marked increase in quality of bowling across the world.
Surely a worthy criteria for selecting an opening batsman?Arlott and Brearley got on extremely well, and indeed back in the 80s a book containing their conversations was published - I reckon JA only selected him for this exercise because he knew he'd be back in the pavilion almost straight away after going out to bat, and they'd be able to carry their convivial quaffing of a vintage Beaujolais
Given that he would be watching from heaven (or wherever else he ended up), that would be a feat of notable achievement.Arlott and Brearley got on extremely well, and indeed back in the 80s a book containing their conversations was published - I reckon JA only selected him for this exercise because he knew he'd be back in the pavilion almost straight away after going out to bat, and they'd be able to carry their convivial quaffing of a vintage Beaujolais
Here is John Arlott's "Desert Island" cricket XI. According to Arlott it is a team "of angels I will most enjoy watching in heaven."
01. Jack Hobbs
02. Mike Brearley
03. Viv Richards
04. Ted Dexter
05. Keith Miller
06. Ian Botham
07. George Brown +
08. Learie Constantine
09. Wilfred Rhodes
10. Jim Laker
11. Wes Hall
12th. Basil D'Oliveira
Cricketing pioneer John Arlott died 10 years ago | Sport | The Guardian