flibbertyjibber
Request Your Custom Title Now!
He has a poor record in Division 1, only does well in Division 2. Too many people taking his Division 2 record into account and ignoring the fact he failed in Division 1.
It really has. 3 tons in 6 innings, best of 172* with centuries in both innings of their current game. This year's been his first real good year though, which for a 30 year old probably means he's extremely unlikely to be selected for England, especially when these runs have come in Div 2.BTW, Daryl Mitchell's form for Worcs has been pretty great this year. Wonder how far he is from being considered.
The argument is that they're average but the certainly qualify as 'batting' as when you look around the County scene they probably make it into the top half in terms of batting strength. It's not like Lancashire a few years ago where it was Katich or bust. They've got two very good domestic batsmen and a host of average ones which is enough to make their batting above average.Suggesting Middlesex don't have much batting past their openers isn't suggesting that other teams have more than two quality bats
They just have this alarming tendency this season to collapse in a heap once Robson/Rogers get out. Even in the chase of 470, Rogers and Robson made over 300 of those runs.
I reckon Rossington is quite a decent prospect tbh. My criticism is more a case of "why are these guys seen as County Championship favourites when they'll probably lose one of their two performing batsmen to England duty, and the rest of their bats don't seem to step up very often."
Warwickshire bat deep but bat mediocre; so, so reliant upon the all-rounders (Woakes, Barker and, seemingly, Jeets + the rest of the tail) to get them to competitive totals; Javid is a decent prospect and Evans might be proving himself to be decent quality, but there really isn't much there either. On name alone, there's no way Middlesex should be going down by an innings to them; the batsmen, Rogers/Robson aside, have underperformed.
I don't understand the point you're making though - you're saying that Denly and Dexter are "very average" along with the rest of the side - which is basically the exact same thing I'm saying!
The alternative of that was the Warwickshire side that won it once, they scored 400+ nearly every game and just ground sides into the dirt with a poor attack making the most of scoreboard pressure.All you need to do is look at Durham's title-winning batting line-up to see what is required to win the Championship if you have a strong enough bowling attack (and providing the competition isn't too strong).
Yes, not entirely serious, having said that I reckon he'd be a decent shout for T20, if Moores could talk him round. Still one of the best performers in domestic cricket.Think Siddy retired from internationals before the Pakistan series over here in 2010 or maybe just after that.
Yeah indeed. I believe he was still in the T20I side when he retired.Yes, not entirely serious, having said that I reckon he'd be a decent shout for T20, if Moores could talk him round. Still one of the best performers in domestic cricket.
Meh TBF, if your talking about the Siddy comment, I've been banging on for ages about him playing t20.
Huh? I just read it, agreed with most of it and thought it raised some good points in argument contrary to the popular stance on this forum.Meh TBF, if your talking about the Siddy comment, I've been banging on for ages about him playing t20.
Not quite sure how Samit bowls more and is better at it than Moeen either.