Swingpanzee
International Regular
Not exactly related to what ^he said above but some of the most atrocious bowling was when the bowler bowled legside to predominantly offside fields.
Wtf? Dhoni got the captaincy in 2008 didn't he? T20 and ODI captaincy in 2007 and the test captaincy in 08 when Kumble retired. So 6 years actually.If we lose this, Dhoni will get to 12 overseas test losses. More than Azharuddin and MAK Pataudi who captained notoriously weak overseas sides. Oh, and Dhoni has only been captain for 4 years while Pataudi and Azhar were both captains for 9 years +
Sums up CW's quandary (of sorts) these last few hours.McCullum WAFG, Watling WAFG, Neesham WAFG. Blocky WTF.
Ashwin ain't there bud.Why is Dhoni avoiding press conferences by sending out guys like Sharma and Dhawan?
Nah his legacy is already set. #1 Test ranking, 50 over WC win, T20 WC win in the span of 5 years. Needs to step back and let the next batch achieve things though.I suspect Dhoni's been kept on his legacy of winning the WC for India after 28 years....countless arguments I've seen in favour of keeping Dhoni are along the likes of "oh he won us the CT and WC...and now you're intent on axing him..."
A little over 5 years. November 2008-presentWtf? Dhoni got the captaincy in 2008 didn't he? T20 and ODI captaincy in 2007 and the test captaincy in 08 when Kumble retired. So 6 years actually.
It is. But most of the criticism of him is as a test captain. In the short forms, his captaincy works but it's terrible for the 5day format imo. Just think he's incredibly overrated as a test captain when some call him the greatest indian captain or some **** like that.Nah his legacy is already set. #1 Test ranking, 50 over WC win, T20 WC win in the span of 5 years. Needs to step back and let the next batch achieve things though.
You said 6. We were both wrong, ****Well you said 4.
He was more correct.You said 6. We were both wrong, ****
Less wrong maybeHe was more correct.
This is a bit hypocritical. During the Eden Part Test, you said...Mate, try and read Cricinfo as an NZer when both the commentators and every published comment is about how bad the Indians are playing
India didn't bowl NZ out for 100.
They got Rutherford for a duck, then you saw Fulton play a bad shot, Williamson play a bad shot, Taylor brain explode and run McCullum out. I take your point that the scoreboard read 100 all out but that was more due to NZ imploding than India being threatening with the ball.