First contact in the middle of the line, not behind. No ball.wow
mixed opinions on radio as to whether that should have been no ball or not. Thoughts?
Clearly a no-ball, nothing behind the line. I just hate the whole "check when a wicket falls" BS.wow
mixed opinions on radio as to whether that should have been no ball or not. Thoughts?
Lolwow
mixed opinions on radio as to whether that should have been no ball or not. Thoughts?
First contact in the middle of the line, not behind. No ball.
Thanks, and yes I hate it too - sick of typing out that the third umpire or automatic system should call the no-balls thoughClearly a no-ball, nothing behind the line. I just hate the whole "check when a wicket falls" BS.
Yeah pretty poor.Clearly a no-ball, nothing behind the line. I just hate the whole "check when a wicket falls" BS.
Having watched while listening to the radio at times I do get the impression a couple of the radio comms are blind/confused at timesLol
It was clearly a no ball.
The Wagner camera angles were less conclusive since there was nothing available from a low angle.Similar to the wagner one,could have gone either way
Easily your worst IMO.Was Zaheer bowling well? He never seems to get wickets when bowling well these days. Was the case in the few tests leading up to his axing from the test side as well.
sounds like he bowled a few good balls early but didn't keep it up.Was Zaheer bowling well? He never seems to get wickets when bowling well these days. Was the case in the few tests leading up to his axing from the test side as well.