Ausage
Cricketer Of The Year
Yeah, their performance was streaky at best.Surprised any of them would need it given the lack of runs this tour.
Apologies all round for that one.
Yeah, their performance was streaky at best.Surprised any of them would need it given the lack of runs this tour.
Apologies all round for that one.
Is there some kind of subliminal message in your username Mr 5-0??haha wow how good was that?
Brilliant, and welcome to the forum.haha wow how good was that?
I reckon his bail was being presented in an attractive gift box as he snapped this pic.Reckon the gift from warne will be this image framed
Doubt it will be anytime soon assuming they need to beat SA away next month to grab that numero uno spot.For Australia, stabilise the top order and I can't see why they don't go to #1 again
We've beaten them away before...Doubt it will be anytime soon assuming they need to beat SA away next month to grab that numero uno spot.
We'll find out very shortly.
Broad for Siddle IMOCombined team of the series
1. Rogers
2. Warner
3. Watson
4. Clarke
5. Smith
6. Stokes
7. Haddin
8. Johnson
9. Harris
10. Siddle
11. Lyon.
It says it all when barely an English player is even close to making the best X1 from the series.Combined team of the series
1. Rogers
2. Warner
3. Watson
4. Clarke
5. Smith
6. Stokes
7. Haddin
8. Johnson
9. Harris
10. Siddle
11. Lyon.
I wouldn't say the team in 09 was any better than this one, as they proved playing England in 09 and 10/11. The bowling is as good. Batting could go either way, but if we manage to put together some scores then we could get up.With a very different team though.
I doubt you'll win over there but over the next couple of years you can challenge for the top spot if the batting clicks properly. No point pretending it's all been glorious in that respect, top order has been as embarrassing as ours in first innings in general, though individuals have still stood up which is the big difference in that respect.
Especially when the one non-Australian picked is a KiwiIt says it all when barely an English player is even close to making the best X1 from the series.
Stokes yes.
Shows how weak England were, as there's no way Watson deserves to be in any ToS.Combined team of the series
1. Rogers
2. Warner
3. Watson
4. Clarke
5. Smith
6. Stokes
7. Haddin
8. Johnson
9. Harris
10. Siddle
11. Lyon.
Also says it all that Stokes was considered lucky to be on the tour yet he was probably our best player.It says it all when barely an English player is even close to making the best X1 from the series.
Stokes yes. Broad for Siddle probably, and forget the rest.