Hurricane
Hall of Fame Member
What did he say? just that the ODI opening bowlers should have been in the test line up?Heh, Bravo sending a shot across the bow of the WI selectors there.
What did he say? just that the ODI opening bowlers should have been in the test line up?Heh, Bravo sending a shot across the bow of the WI selectors there.
a) Give him a run to see if he's improved since his last incarnation on the International stage. Unless Milne is bowling dross at the moment then his bowling > Neesham's bowling.? We've already got one fast medium pie-chucker in the team, and he actually takes wickets. Why bother with another's?
Yup, just saying that Rampaul and Holder are the best bowlers WI have in any form of the game.What did he say? just that the ODI opening bowlers should have been in the test line up?
If he's going to bat eight anyway then Neesham should only be selected in the role he's in if he's the best bowler available for selection. With Nathan McCullum, Mills and Corey Anderson in the side, the lower order does not need further strengthening at the expense of playing more than two legitimate bowlers. If the selectors are backing Neesham ahead of Milne on bowling alone then that's fine but I don't really think it's the case as such.? We've already got one fast medium pie-chucker in the team, and he actually takes wickets. Why bother with another's?
Wow - I'm buying a lotto ticket tomorrow. Don't think we have ever agreed on an interesting call before.If he's going to bat eight anyway then Neesham should only be selected in the role he's in if he's the best bowler available for selection. With Nathan McCullum, Mills and Corey Anderson in the side, the lower order does not need further strengthening at the expense of playing more than two legitimate bowlers. If the selectors are backing Neesham ahead of Milne on bowling alone then that's fine but I don't really think it's the case as such.
For the longer version of the game i'd say they are 2nd and 3rd best obviously behind RoachYup, just saying that Rampaul and Holder are the best bowlers WI have in any form of the game.
Indeed. He is getting picked even though he is out of form.Next game i'd play Edwards in place of Deonarine..
Lol you cheeky bugger!!Only 4 exclamation marks in that post WW, well contained.
And yeah, Roach, Rampaul and Holder would be my ideal attack, it gives you an out and out quick, a swing bowler and a tall seamer. Best can replace Roach, while Sammy can replace Holder or Rampaul in the case of an injury.
Down to two. Keep up the good workLol you cheeky bugger!!
personally i wouldn't have Sammy back inthe fold...he's had four years to improve but he's only gone backwards. Interms of "swing" we have a Trinidad lad named Marlon Richards who made his first class debut last season and looked very good indeed. Whle Miguel Cummins also knows how to move the ball either side at good pace...i suspect both of those names will be in contention soon enough.
Some day you're just going to have to accept that whatever side is on the field is your "best side". We all have our fantasy lineups but they're just not meant to beI'm Surprised we won with half our best side out though.i guess that bodes well for the future.
There's probably a legitimate case to be made for Neesham as a bowler over Milne.If he's going to bat eight anyway then Neesham should only be selected in the role he's in if he's the best bowler available for selection. With Nathan McCullum, Mills and Corey Anderson in the side, the lower order does not need further strengthening at the expense of playing more than two legitimate bowlers. If the selectors are backing Neesham ahead of Milne on bowling alone then that's fine but I don't really think it's the case as such.
He will be a loss. Hopefully this article is still accurate and we have him until the world cup Kyle Mills eyeing 2015 WC glory at home before retiringMills is going to be such a huge loss when he retires next year. Yeah Southee is arguably as good an ODI bowler these days, but there's not a lot of other economical wicket taking LO bowlers floating around.
This is rubbish though.Very interesting article in the Trinidad Guardian today. Apparently Sammy injured Darren Bravo by deliberately bowling a beamer in the nets after Lil B had spoken out against the bowlers during a team meeting.
.
Blaming the bowlers for the batting performance is ****ty. Yeah, it's fair enough to say that they didn't bowl full enough, but the ones responsible for batting are the batsmen."...After the batsmen saw how badly the bowlers performed when New Zealand batted, it was a complete let down and it resulted in the gutless batting performance in the second innings"