12:45pm brisbane time iircYeah, somewhat ironically, for GF's boy to play, Watson is pretty much a must.
What time (GMT) is the squad announced btw Spikey?
Johnson.Who exactly is my boy?
Yeah, somewhat ironically, for GF's boy to play, Watson is pretty much a must.
What time (GMT) is the squad announced btw Spikey?
Spikey pls.12:45pm brisbane time iirc
Almost right. Why was **** filtered out in your post?My understanding is that you're a giant ****.
When I said I'm happy to use the Chanderpaul example again, I meant my Chanderpaul example earlier in the thread where I said that Clarke's situation is different to Chanderpaul's as at the moment Chanders is batting at 5 with Ramdin and Sammy behind him while Clarke would still have Smith and Haddin so Clarke should bat where he actually wants to bat.The Chanderpaul example is terrible because he clearly should be batting at at least 4 in this side, and probably most sides he's played in really.
However Clarke is a totally different batsman and not as adept at playing the moving ball, so staying at 5 probably isn't a bad idea.
Cabnut plsJohnson.
oh sorry, I completely agree then.When I said I'm happy to use the Chanderpaul example again, I meant my Chanderpaul example earlier in the thread where I said that Clarke's situation is different to Chanderpaul's as at the moment Chanders is batting at 5 with Ramdin and Sammy behind him while Clarke would still have Smith and Haddin so Clarke should bat where he actually wants to bat.
Yes, that's my understanding tooMy understanding is Watson will be playing exclusively as a batsman. Is this the case?