Oh they were considered - considered irrelevantGood to see SS performances being taken into consideration
Who, Skidmark? Was only a seven day ban ffsCan't believe he's back
3. Scored a quick fire 12 not to win against the Kiwis.That's across two innings, isn't it?
Lyon will be bowling into footmarks and he has a pretty good record at the gabba, I think you need a specialist spinner up there anywayI think there's more going for that idea than against it considering Lyon isn't a massive 5th day contributor. TPC and Pup and maybe a bit of Warner can provide sufficient spin options and Forkers shortens the tail whilst providing some cover for when Johnson's radar goes screwy.
I didn't hear any ****s on here who were massive Blewett fans bitching when he got a test gig on the back of a few OD'ers for Aus A against an inept England side in 94-95.What are his one day stats there like? Seeing as that's the only way test cricketers should be judged on.
210 runs at 70 for Warner.What are his one day stats there like? Seeing as that's the only way test cricketers should be judged on.
I recall posting strongly against it in the Ashes subforum at the time.I didn't hear any ****s on here who were massive Blewett fans bitching when he got a test gig on the back of a few OD'ers for Aus A against an inept England side in 94-95.
#ExplanationNation210 runs at 70.