kyear2
International Coach
But I agree with your anaylst as I would bat him at 7 and as a 3rd seamer in a 5 man attack, but thats the only way he plays. He is not strong enough of a batsman to earn a place in an ATG scenario and as a bowler his wpm showed he wasn't strong enough to be part of a traditional 4 man attack.I think Miller isn't as good as Mock thinks and not as bad as kyear2 is making out.
If you are going to play GIlchrist as your keeper and go in with 2 spinners, Miller at 7 is an excellent choice.
Sobers actually was burdened by a heavier bowling work loan than Miller (230 deliveries pm compared to 190 for Miller) and still maintained his batting average and againts better bowling atacks. But according to your theory wonder where Sobers average would have been without having to bowl all of those overs, plus the rediculous amount of first class cricket he played all over the world.Yeh, I get your point. I'm not a blind advocate for Miller, but I think he was pretty special in terms of being a cricketer. And in my opinion, he is the complete all-rounder.
Had he not been a bowler, he would've been selected as a top 6 batsman. And I can only speculate on this, but I think his test average as a batsman unburdened by bowling would've been a lot closer to 50 than it was. He was a proper top 6 batsman, unlike some others mentioned.
Also, he was without doubt second choice bowler for Australia in his era, and some would argue he was a better pace bowler than Lindwall.
Regarding his wickets per match ratio, he was actually very cleverly captained by Bradman and Hassett. Used as an opening strike bowler for fewer overs than he might've bowled, with Bill Johnston and Lindwall doing the heavy work. Admittedly he had back problems which probably stopped him bowling more than he did as well.
Many of the players listed (Dev, Vettori, Cairns, Khan) were not really top 6 batsmen, and spent a lot of their careers at 7 or 8 in the batting order. Similarly, it's debatable whether Greig or Sobers or some others would be selected as bowlers without their batting. Possibly, but maybe not.
As an overall package Miller was undeniably good though. Top 6 bat, genuine opening bowler. True all rounder. Giving a team the ability to play two spinners and three quicks.
I don't think i'm really saying Miller was better than he was. I'm mostly saying that as a cricketer he adds a ridiculous amount of versatility to a team.
Last edited: