Yeah, it's interesting. I actually think Broad and Bresnan have bowled well today, and Swann was always going to be a threat. But there's just been too many four balls, a lot of them from Anderson earlier, and it's meant there's rarely been a lot of pressure.He bowled well though. He doesn't always have to take wickets for the England attack to fire but when he's actually having an off day and bowling poorly I think it can struggle a bit.
Pretty good I'd say. Slightly two paced, the odd one keeping low and it'll turn quite a lot later on. Decent pace and carry for the most part as well.What's the pitch like btw? Rumours about the dodgy looking track proved to be false?
Really pissed that I've been unable to watch so much of the series.
Really hard, but dry. We've seen some big turn already and there's largely been very good carry too, even if it's a bit two-paced. One of those pitches where you either want to be bowling fast or bowling spin; trying to bowl medium pace and nip it around will make you a good support bowler at best on it IMO. Very good toss to win though; could turn into anything by Day 5 judging by some of the turn we've seen.What's the pitch like btw? Rumours about the dodgy looking track proved to be false?
nobody cares about your porn editing careerHave spent the last 3 hours trying to edit a media film from 12 minutes to under 10 making careful, precise cuts, it's the most arduous and annoying thing, but at least I have good cricket to watch
He's due .....They have lost 6 tests in a row...
We have seen they are capable of playing good cricket but even you are your most negative know that England are a better side.
Cook going to make 200.
Yeah; I tend to think the rest of the attack needs Anderson to be bowling well in order to be successful more than Anderson needs the rest of the attack, if that makes sense.Yeah, it's interesting. I actually think Broad and Bresnan have bowled well today, and Swann was always going to be a threat. But there's just been too many four balls, a lot of them from Anderson earlier, and it's meant there's rarely been a lot of pressure.
Speak for yourself.nobody cares about your porn editing career
Do find it entertaining reading wpdavid talking about England.
True with most bowling attacks, if the top dog is bowling well, they often followYeah; I tend to think the rest of the attack needs Anderson to be bowling well in order to be successful more than Anderson needs the rest of the attack, if that makes sense.
hehe, sorry, but it would cause a ruckus if I made a porno for yr 12 media! You'll have to look elsewhereSpeak for yourself.
Speak for yourself. Hook me up, Maximus Decimus Meredius.nobody cares about your porn editing career
was that a sly at my perverted private lifehehe, sorry, but it would cause a ruckus if I made a porno for yr 12 media! You'll have to look elsewhere
Really?hehe
yes, why?Really?
Pretty good I'd say. Slightly two paced, the odd one keeping low and it'll turn quite a lot later on. Decent pace and carry for the most part as well.
Cheers. Starc selection may prove handy after all then. Should get some decent reverse.Really hard, but dry. We've seen some big turn already and there's largely been very good carry too, even if it's a bit two-paced. One of those pitches where you either want to be bowling fast or bowling spin; trying to bowl medium pace and nip it around will make you a good support bowler at best on it IMO. Very good toss to win though; could turn into anything by Day 5 judging by some of the turn we've seen.