I don't like these ****s but they raise a point. It has to be Bird IMO.dont play faulkner pls
Yeah I really don't see any good reason why we shouldn't be doing that. Both are probably the two most similar bowlers in ability and style we have, so it's the closest like-for-like replacement. And if possible it's also obv better if both don't have to play back to back tests. Plus we have enough depth to fill in the other spaces. Like I fear now what's going to happen is that Harris will be played again and will break down. It's just not really sustainable.Then him and Harris play alternate tests then.
How about we try a new strategy and give him some time to develop or else there will come a time when he is completely ****edNo issues, get Cummins in.
Do you mean swinging conditions?While Pattinson is very good and all, I really think Bird is going to be the next great Australian bowler. He should've been playing in both Tests if fit because there were overcast conditions in both English first innings and he would've been a handful with his style.
g00fers wont play imo.will be pretty lulz if magoffin plays and wrecks the aussies. not that impossible to imagine even, he's been in top form all season.
He's quite old (27) to have only played 20 FC matches, is he quite injury prone too?While Pattinson is very good and all, I really think Bird is going to be the next great Australian bowler. He should've been playing in both Tests if fit because there were overcast conditions in both English first innings and he would've been a handful with his style.