Broad suffered four in a year tbf. And has had five since late 2010In the England setup its only really Tremlett who is an injury liability. He'd play every game if he was fit, ala Harris. I don't know whether its game management or just luck though.
Agreed, sucks for Patto but from a team perspective I don't think this is of great consequence to the Aussies in this series. Bird is a perfectly capable replacement and their bowling stocks and ability has never been in question.Shame, he is a huge talent with both bat and ball. Aussies will miss him although this is the area they can afford to lose someone from and still have a good replacement come in.
Had a back injury and missed a while but most of his problems were caused by Cooley trying to change his action.I think Anderson had injuries early in his career too, didn't he?
Age is a factor too iirc.In the England setup its only really Tremlett who is an injury liability. He'd play every game if he was fit, ala Harris. I don't know whether its game management or just luck though.
I know a few of us have taken piss saying your quicks are made of glass in past but this is a serious worry now as he can't play a series without breaking down. Makes you think of Bruce Reid all the time.****ing devastated by this tbh. I know we have decent fast bowling stocks, but I hate these serious injuries, more so when they happen to complete guns. This bloke really is the shiz.
From a technical standpoint, Pattinson is much, much better than Bond, Lillee, Gillespie or Lee were at the same age so the chances of him having a long career are pretty good IMO - reckon this is just another example of growing pains in a young fast bowlerI think if you went through the history of successful 85+ mph bowlers historically, most of them have had back injuries in their teens or early 20s. I don't think it necessarily designates him as injury prone in the long term. He could be a Shane Bond but he could just as easily be a Brett Lee in that sense.