Spikey
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Dean Jones?My favourite player retired in 1994.
Dean Jones?My favourite player retired in 1994.
Pace doesn't matter in England. Accuracy and movement is much more important.Siddle really has to work on his pace though. I don't think he topped 140ks once. Really needs some meat, actually looks a bit gaunt around the face.
Quoting for new page oh my god
YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSz
His feet seemed to be going towards square leg. Weird, weird shot.Pieterson's four looked so bad compared to his wicket ball
If by 'majestic century' you mean 'attractive twenty before a ludicrously stupid shot'.Time for Burgey's favourite player to score a majestic century.
Yeah giving it to Paine would have been the easy and better option. Perhaps Paine or Warner (ha) will captain the first class matches? I wonder if Boof is a Paine fan? Have I read too much into Wade not playing in either warmup? Or does Lehmann want a keeper who can catch.I do think Finch could possibly storm right into test contention if he has even has a good 10 game FC run......but he wasn't even playing in the shield last year so you just can't pick him. Bailey should have been called in, or at least former Australia A captain Tim Paine given the VC
I don't mind if Siddle changes his whole MO, but historically he hasn't been that kind of bowler. He has had success by running in hard, bowling fast and getting subtle seam movement.Pace doesn't matter in England. Accuracy and movement is much more important.
Bell hasn't made an attractive twenty in quite a while. Plenty of turgid, stodgy twenties thoughIf by 'majestic century' you mean 'attractive twenty before a ludicrously stupid shot'.
You utter utter ****. What an awful thing to say.Dean Jones?
There's been nothing wrong with Siddle's pace so far this Test so your comments are baffling.I don't mind if Siddle changes his whole MO, but historically he hasn't been that kind of bowler. He has had success by running in hard, bowling fast and getting subtle seam movement.