Yeah precisely. Main reason I think pinch-hitters are a bit under-utilised in limited overs, because you often don't lose anything by using them.Well it wasn't necessary but there wasn't anything to lose either so as I said at the time, I liked the move. If he got out, he got out - then Mathews could come in anyway. He wasn't just going to soak up dot balls; he's surprisingly hard to actually bowl dot balls to in general. Given he had nothing to lose it took a lot of pressure out of what was going to be a tense chase in a big game.
Pinch hitting is a legitimate tactic for the middle overs once the ball has lost its shine and the lesser bowlers are usually on like in this game. Almost never works earlier in the innings though as the bowling too good.Yeah precisely. Main reason I think pinch-hitters are a bit under-utilised in limited overs, because you often don't lose anything by using them.
An abandonment means you guys are through. On the other hand, an abandonment means England would be relying on Australia beating Sri Lanka, but not by a large enough margin for their net run rate to surpass ours.If it's gonna rain, it better ****ing piss down.
I can just see us getting ****ed over by Duckworth-Lewis, chasing 182, being 32/2 in the 11th over, coming back out and needing 385 off 15.
They caught Sri Lanka on a really poor batting day and only just snuck in by one wicket, then they weren't looking too flash in the chase vs Aus, but it was way to early to call, they deserve to go through, but they've yet to put in an all-round solid performance.Why? We would be the only unbeaten team in the group.
Likewise SL caught us on a very poor batting day and we still won.They caught Sri Lanka on a really poor batting day and only just snuck in by one wicket, then they weren't looking too flash in the chase vs Aus, but it was way to early to call, they deserve to go through, but they've yet to put in an all-round solid performance.
Would have played less games than anyone else as well, tbf.Why? We would be the only unbeaten team in the group.
Yeah, but it really could have gone either way, in any case NZ have had a decent couple of games and deserve to go through.Likewise SL caught us on a very poor batting day and we still won.
There is a perception, probably because he's been a late starter and his FC record isn't a Hayden-like one of dominance, that he doesn't deserve to be on the team. He cops a slagging in the press and among the wider cricket watching community here, but he's been really good for us since he came into the side. IMO we could do a lot worse than have him in the test side ATM. Bit of an old head, stable character from a very down to earth background and a genuine middle order player who isn't yet another opener they're trying to bat out of position.
Bresnan is picked I would imagine not only to add some depth and power hitting to the lower order, but more importantly to utilise any reverse swing that may be around. England got it going in the first fixture but couldn't, maybe in part due to a ball change, get it swinging against SL. I do think Finn has to come in to give us a bit of penetration, but he gets the nod over Broad for me.Don't get why England are playing Bresnan in a four man attack.
His ODI stats are pretty mediocre and unless the ball is moving around, he really doesn't have the tools needed to stop good batsmen.
Only way I'd consider playing him is an all allrounder in a five man attack.
In a four man attack, your best bowlers have to play and IMO they've got to get Finn in there.
You've brought up the ball change twice; there's two balls out there, obviously the one that wasn't changed couldn't get going either, ball change is irrelevant.Bresnan is picked I would imagine not only to add some depth and power hitting to the lower order, but more importantly to utilise any reverse swing that may be around. England got it going in the first fixture but couldn't, maybe in part due to a ball change, get it swinging against SL. I do think Finn has to come in to give us a bit of penetration, but he gets the nod over Broad for me.