I knew you'd do thatI'll take Maurice Tate who, ironically enough, doesn't feature on the Lord's bowling board - he's on the batting one.
Sorry for the delay, I'm currently umpiring the final of the mighty 10Cs.
Sorryoh ffs Jager....
That predictable?I knew you'd do that
I also liked the idea of Charlie Griffith (5-91, Lords 1963) getting a run in one of our drafts, especially with Wayne Daniel bowling at the other end. Can't go wrong with Maurice Tate though.I'll take Maurice Tate who, ironically enough, doesn't feature on the Lord's bowling board - he's on the batting one.
Sorry for the delay, I'm currently umpiring the final of the mighty 10Cs.
So that gives me the following XI:I'll take Maurice Tate who, ironically enough, doesn't feature on the Lord's bowling board - he's on the batting one.
Sorry for the delay, I'm currently umpiring the final of the mighty 10Cs.
Really nice team Michael with a top 5 to die for, and a wonderfully eclectic bowling line-up.Charles Macartney (Lords) for my final selection please
Charter 77 Final XI
Gordon Greenidge
Sid Barnes
Charles Macartney
Everton Weekes
Frank Worrell (*)
Billy Murdoch (+)
Shaun Pollock
Amar Singh
Waqar Younis
Muttiah Muralitharin
Brian Statham
Yeah I'm quite pleased with the bowling attack. I like the combination of bowlers I ended up with on the whole.Really like your attack Sam as it has a great combination of attacking [Akthar/Botham] and miserly [Goddard/Barnes/O'Reilly] bowlers. But all aggressive.
Why? Neither of them really played that many games with him iirc.Normally I'd select Prasanna but having Imran and Miandad in the side changes the dynamics somewhat.
Probably swayed by watching videos of Saqlain bowling today. But he did dismiss a line-up of very good players against spin bowling;Why? Neither of them really played that many games with him iirc.
Surprising pick.