That would seem to be the case. It would be odd to have a non-Clause ad-hoc pick after the 11th Round.I just want clarification that with there only being 11 clauses we're only having 11 rounds?
Nah, there should only be 11 rounds here.Archie Jackson (Highest score on debut)
If I now find out there are 12 rounds and the final one has no restrictions, I'll kill somebody.
You and I, gattling gun each.Archie Jackson (Highest score on debut)
If I now find out there are 12 rounds and the final one has no restrictions, I'll kill somebody.
I can't actually work out a way to find this easily. Is there one?Best of luck to everyone else with the clause. Am very interested as to who gets taken as I was able to find a grand total of 3 reasonable players
Nah, he debuted in 1932. Hobbs retired in 1930.Did Bill O'Reilly ever dismiss Hobbs?
Yeah It's certainly one of the toughest clauses. I have a clear strategy with it though but it involves a fair bit of risk. Archie Jackson was the best player I could find with it so good choiceBest of luck to everyone else with the clause. Am very interested as to who gets taken as I was able to find a grand total of 3 reasonable players
Nope.I can't actually work out a way to find this easily. Is there one?
I haven't found one yet.I can't actually work out a way to find this easily. Is there one?
Cheers!Nope.
I first looked at highest scores on debut and cross referenced with career HSs.
All-round records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPN Cricinfo
My thinking was that any batsman/allrounder worth his salt would've scored a ton at some point.
For bowlers
All-round records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPN Cricinfo
I looked at the lowest highest scores and then for any player that I deemed reasonable, checked it against their debut.
5 Test limit was because the number of notable cricketers who played 1-5 Tests can basically be counted on one finger, and nope, his highest score wasn't on debut.