Satyanash89
Banned
Is this the first hundred from ABdV. where no one before him in the innings has tonned up? Superb hundred to rescue them from a not great position
Why do you think you need five specialist bowlers to get Pakistan out?Because we need an extra bowler not an extra batsman. As I mentioned before philander is a genuine allrounder, kleinveldt can hold a bat etc. Why play an extra batsman? The team will be unbalanced
Yup. Will just add to Pakistan's misery.Pro to ton up??
Well the team chemistry was 7 batsmen, 5 bowlers, we left out kallis our fifth bowler and top orfer batsman, replacing him with a batsman takes our fifth bowler away, which is always handy. Cause if a bowler gets injured and peterson goes for 5+ an over we'd have 2 bowlers to bowl pak out. Not to mention abott and kleinveldt strengthened our tail to almost make up for missing kallis.Why do you think you need five specialist bowlers to get Pakistan out?
Yeah ideally you'd have picked another batting allrounder. You don't really seem to have one in the frame, but a fifth bowler is a luxury rather than a requirement, and the #7 batting position is far more important in general, especially against Pakistan.Well the team chemistry was 7 batsmen, 5 bowlers, we left out kallis our fifth bowler and top orfer batsman, replacing him with a batsman takes our fifth bowler away, which is always handy. Cause if a bowler gets injured and peterson goes for 5+ an over we'd have 2 bowlers to bowl pak out. Not to mention abott and kleinveldt strengthened our tail to almost make up for missing kallis.
On the other hand, if we had duminy in for elgar, I recon neil mckenzie could have been close to a recall. Then we'd have duminy, peterson, steyn philander and kleinveldt to bowl.
ETA: no one can replace kallis, but its our best option available.
Fifth bowler is handy, if in the last test Pak attacked peterson, we would have been in serious trouble, kallis had a niggle and morkel was out. We basically had three bowlers left.Yeah ideally you'd have picked another batting allrounder. You don't really seem to have one in the frame, but a fifth bowler is a luxury rather than a requirement, and the #7 batting position is far more important in general, especially against Pakistan.
Stats relating to when batsmen score hundreds typically don't include the times they fail to score hundreds, no.Does these stats include times he gout south africa out of trouble without scoring a hundred?
And that at the cost of Nasir Jamshaid....who looked somewhat decent against the new ball at least compared to Hafiz and others...I only just realised Farhat was playing
I didn't even know he was on tour! Did they send him over when Taufeeq went home?
Haha no I read and replied to the post terribly, I thought it was another reference to the downhill skier situation, I blame the hangover.Stats relating to when batsmen score hundreds typically don't include the times they fail to score hundreds, no.
It's only his second test.Rahat Ali with a chance to claim one of the worst five-for's in test cricket.
And? It still was pretty bad bowling for the most part....It's only his second test.