Indeed and that would be bull**** as well.If this ws at Galle instead of Hobart, plenty of people will be calling for curators head.
Indeed, it's like having a marathon runner not training for a marathon because he's worried about feeling tired. If the injuries are the result of a weak, flexible youthful body, all they're doing is stretching out the process. If they're going to get injured, they're going to get ****ing injured so if they're fit you need to play them.I'm glad they didn't do this **** when Warne and McGrath were starting out. The cotton wool approach isn't working based on the injury count.
The Galle pitch was great this year.If this ws at Galle instead of Hobart, plenty of people will be calling for curators head.
The thing I don't get about the Starc resting thing is, if true, that means we have no back-up bowler in the squad. I mean, you're resting Starc.
well hilf got injured with a side strain. that's hardly the same as a stress injury in the back/foot is it. that's what they're trying to avoid by resting.with hilf getting injured the next test, and him being old and sturdy and all, resting is clearly useless
check out the sports science loverwell hilf got injured with a side strain. that's hardly the same as a stress injury in the back/foot is it. that's what they're trying to avoid by resting.
It's still an incorrect decision regardless of how big the umpire's error is.This might be a good idea. I can't say I'm a hundred percent comfortable with a decision being automatically overturned because it pitched 2mm outside leg - though it may be accurate and true to the spirit of the law, it's definitely not why the system is in place
Better than Siddle, Johnson and Starc IMO.So don't tell me, our bowling attack at boxing day will be Siddle, Johnson and some **** FC bowler.
Kill me now........