Why? He opened the bowling in almost every game he played and was successful doing it.Not sure that Shaun Pollock can be described as a new ball bowler in the context of an ATG team? Peter yes, Shaun no.
A medium pacer with boring figures against Australia doesn't excite me.Why? He opened the bowling in almost every game he played and was successful doing it.
Perfect when combined with Donald imo.
He was a good foil to Alan Donald early in his career, and to Ntini later. Kept one end tight, built pressure, let the more aggressive quick take the wickets from the other end.A medium pacer with boring figures against Australia doesn't excite me.
Don't get me wrong, Shaun Pollock is an excellent bowler and would make a great first change bowler if I wasn't going to pick Procter as the superior bowling allrounder.Stats from the Past: The best new-ball pairs in Test cricket | Highlights | Cricinfo Magazine | ESPN Cricinfo
Shaun Pollock and Allan Donald formed possibly the best new ball pair of all time.
yeah... Pollock was mindblowing in the first half of his career... averaged something like 19 after 70 matches at more than 4 wpm iirc...Why? He opened the bowling in almost every game he played and was successful doing it.
Perfect when combined with Donald imo.
Well Donalds figures against Australia arent too flash either, are they?A medium pacer with boring figures against Australia doesn't excite me.
that's the exact thing i thoughtI actually think the number of allrounders available means there's much more room for manouvre in this side.
how much did you see of leroux?Allan Donald and Garth LeRoux
and thisDonald and Steyn
Pollock is actually my first bowler picked but I want him at first change and we were told to pick the opening bowlers, so yeah.
Yeah, it gives us one spot that could theoretically go to anyone. I see us picking Kallis + Faulkner + four other specialist bats and a keeper, and Pollock/Procter + two other specialist seamers... but the spot that we'd usually think of as the spinner spot may end up going to someone else entirely because of the extra bowling Kallis and Faulkner already give us. Looking at how the West Indies team ended up I'd not be surprised if both Pollock and Procter made the cut and Faulkner ended up the lone spinner.really late
that's the exact thing i thought
Procter has some serious fans on CW though. I actually expect him to be picked over Pollock, and with so many bowling options in the side already people may feel the need to stack the batting a little rather than pick another specialist.I think the difference between Proctor and Tayfield is smaller than the difference between Holding and Gibbs though.