Stapel
International Regular
Yeah, while typing the last post I got that feeling...... Hey, it's early Sunday morning here!Yeah that's what I said earlier!
Pointless discussion is pointless.
Yeah, while typing the last post I got that feeling...... Hey, it's early Sunday morning here!Yeah that's what I said earlier!
Pointless discussion is pointless.
http://www.cricketweb.net/forum/testing-forum/58214-do-we-really-need-daemon.htmlYeah that's what I said earlier!
Pointless discussion is pointless.
bribes imoCount 4 (Y)s tbh
bribes imo
well i guess you could say they were indeed bribes.He taught me how to find porn in Singapore.
Swann at 8 and Anderson at 9 is fine IMO. It's just a typical lower order rather than your usual ridiculous one. Prior's the best #7 in world cricket too which obviously helps.Cricket press seem to be assuming Finn for Broad and Bell for Bairstow then.
Thoughts? Length of the tail worries me somewhat; Anderson at #9 far from optimal, especially with Trott and Bell not in prime nick and Denis jr and Sammy, at best, unproven.
Lot of responsibility on Messrs Cook, Pietersen & Prior.
I am sorry Dameon, I was only joking You know I love youYeah I haven't forgiven him for it.
I think there is either way - as someone else said, Broad isn't making loads of runs anyway. I'm happy enough to have more than one of our quicks presenting a genuine threat with the new ball, as I don't think we can rely on the spinners taking 19 wickets again.Cricket press seem to be assuming Finn for Broad and Bell for Bairstow then.
Thoughts? Length of the tail worries me somewhat; Anderson at #9 far from optimal, especially with Trott and Bell not in prime nick and Denis jr and Sammy, at best, unproven.
Lot of responsibility on Messrs Cook, Pietersen & Prior.