ohh yeah i read that wrong, i thought ya meant dismiss him by bouncing himPretty much my point. If they really try to kill him, reckon he'll get away quickly. Is one of those bats who likes to take you on. Entertaining no matter which way it goes.
Indeed. Quiney isn't the best leaver in the world, especially early, so I think Philander will probably be his biggest worry. If they try and pepper him with Morkel bouncers he will hammer him IMO.Pretty much my point. If they really try to kill him, reckon he'll get away quickly. Is one of those bats who likes to take you on. Entertaining no matter which way it goes.
Here's hoping Starc plays over Lyon now.the real fail here is cameron white
Benchy living it up overseas (y)Watched his press conference boi.
Nah boi.Benchy living it up overseas (y)
This is a more confusing decision to me though, given that one was pretty obvious as to why they fast tracked those two (and a good part of the reason behind Starc too, really) - pace. I'm pretty sure Hazlewood is quicker than the other options, but I wouldn't think so much so that he'd stand out because of it...what does he bowl, like 130-140 or something?i remember when i made the same sorta posts about pattinson and cummins last year
taste it spikey
Nah, both were fast-tracked because they're quality, not because they're quick. Same with Hazlewood. He's a bowler more likely to take Test wickets than Butterworth and McDermott even if he's not as credentialled as Butterworth yet. I'm coming around to Bird but can definitely see why the selectors would be pretty keen to give Hazlewood more of a go than the others.This is a more confusing decision to me though, given that one was pretty obvious as to why they fast tracked those two (and a good part of the reason behind Starc too, really) - pace. I'm pretty sure Hazlewood is quicker than the other options, but I wouldn't think so much so that he'd stand out because of it...what does he bowl, like 130-140 or something?