Spikey
Request Your Custom Title Now!
it really shouldn't count as a wicket if you have the batsman shot between the ball leaving your arm and the ball hitting the stumps so that means nothingSo did Hitler ****.
it really shouldn't count as a wicket if you have the batsman shot between the ball leaving your arm and the ball hitting the stumps so that means nothingSo did Hitler ****.
Read it in the scorebook bro.it really shouldn't count as a wicket if you have the batsman shot between the ball leaving your arm and the ball hitting the stumps so that means nothing
Adolf Hitler 'wanted to use cricket to train troops for war', new book claims - Telegraphwell i took your advice, and actually looked at last night's scorecard and well Patto's figures of 3/19 suggests he's a good OD player
He had “advocated the withdrawal of the use of pads” because the “artificial bolsters” were “unmanly and un-German”.
Genuinely flicking between each game that was on, and hardly watched Patto bowl.for those who actually watched the entire thing, how did Patto actually end up with a bowling economy of around 2? Tight bowling, or just **** that could be left?
If Cummins is fully fit, surely they'd be tempted to unleash him on SA?So Ryan Harris has been ruled out of the Test Series against South Africa meaning one of the 3 bowlers this thread is about will most likely share the pace bowling duties with Siddle and Hilfenhaus.
Starc has been impressing everyone in the shorter formats, but I would probably play Pattinson just ahead of him.
Starc pretty comfortably in LO formats I think. I'd still have Patto over the other two for tests, despite him being a Victorian.Haven't been following too much of Australian cricket recently. How do people rank these guys in the ODI setup? Also are there bowlers people would pick ahead of these three for ODIs?
I rate Starc as our best limited overs bowler, by quite a distance. I personally wouldn't pick Patto for ODIs, but he'd be my first choice Test quick with Siddle and the 'Haus.Haven't been following too much of Australian cricket recently. How do people rank these guys in the ODI setup? Also are there bowlers people would pick ahead of these three for ODIs?
Yeah I agree, there's not that much that's similar between the two of them at all apart from which hand they bowl with. Starc has already shown he has more control than Johnson ever had/has/or will have in the future.cummins.
disagree re starc & johnson. left handedness is all they have in common
Johnson and Starc have completely different actions.But that other was picked on the basis that, at a similar age, he did. Remember all the initial hype about fast-tracking Mitch because Lillee liked his action?
I don't have great faith that he can given his action. I haven't watched him in the last series mind, so it might have improved. Pattinson has a fantastic action, Starc not bad either.I wouldn't. Its actually pretty annoying Cummins is in the Australian squad at the moment. Would much rather him in the NSW setup seeing if he can last a few games in a row without getting injured.