silentstriker
The Wheel is Forever
I think the point they're making is that that sort of thing definitely mounts pressure on young batsmen in a chase. I don't think they're actually saying that it's unacceptable, that the RRR is getting out of control and that the batsmen should take some crazy risks; I think they're just putting forward the idea that inexperienced players may be affected by it and end up thinking that themselves.
Yes, I know. It matters because of that false way of thinking that some (especially young) players and commentators seem to fall for. When they made the point initially, India were doing just fine on the RR. There were a couple maidens, but the overall run rate was perfectly fine. But players feel that if they have a couple maidens, they are somehow behind when they aren't. Hence what I was saying about the match situation. Look at the overall situation - if Aussies are using their best bowlers and keeping you down and you're still doing OK on the overall RR, give them a few overs. If you have wickets and their most economical bowlers have bowled their quota, you should definitely win.That's exactly their point. The dot balls matter, not because they were making it that much harder to chase this down but because the pressure was mounting.
Yea, I don't think it's any good. I haven't seen the tournament either. I was speaking in general with most sides. If it's that terrible, then it would matter even more to preserve wickets now, wouldn't it?I thought it mattered because you said their lower order is no good.
I wouldn't know, I've not seen anything of the tournament tbh.
I'm not saying RR isn't important but in this scenario, chasing the relatively reasonable sized total they are, and the match situation they were in (and are in now, though it will start becoming important soon), RR is not the primary concern. Wickets are - Zol could easily have afforded to play himself in for a few more overs instead of flailing and getting upset that he wasn't rotating the strike.