I am not going to make sense but - my crazy theory is that when the bowlers are on top you should give them their due. They will be bowling faster and they will be in the zone. Shots that you would normally get away with will fail at these moments because they (the bowlers) will get more movement and have more speed and most importantly you won't play with conviction and 100% confidence because they are on top of you.SA are bowling well, but if you take that attitude, he won't score a run ever. Sometimes you have to force the bowlers to bowl badly, not just hope they do, because as we've seen all series, SA rarely bowl **** spells for too long.
I'll go 1 step further and argue that anything that ends up in an umpires call should have been given, but may not have been a "bad" call.dont like how the comms describe that as "congratulations simon taufel, spot on"
obviously not a bad decision but could have easily gone the other way.
By 'Comms' you mean Botham, work it out matedont like how the comms describe that as "congratulations simon taufel, spot on"
obviously not a bad decision but could have easily gone the other way.
Nah, pretty bad review IMO. Marginal on impact and not coming in.dont like how the comms describe that as "congratulations simon taufel, spot on"
obviously not a bad decision but could have easily gone the other way.
So county cricket is club cricket thenman i would be so pissed off if i got out to tahir in club cricket.
edit, and he's a dickhead aswell.
how do you explain to these ****s that there are only two, and they need to get it right. at least they are consistent.Would trust Broad with referral before Tahir, itbt.