He is better than that though Scaly will disagree. Good chance of being leading wicket taker in series as he isn't firing fully yet and already has 5 wickets, god help us if he gets it right.MM keeping that average against England below 35. WAG
I don't think so.To Clarify MM had been get a touch of nip in. This one held its line. eta: that delivery to bell following it was a good example.
lolBumbleCricket:
“@lav_93: @indiamill21 @BumbleCricket teri maa ki choot.. gaanta tera baap ka...”With rice and a Naan bread!
wtf bumble is tweeting -_-
Please watch over 17 again, especially balls 1,3,4 & 6. Its easier to use hawkeye as it shows the trajectory cleaner than timeshifting.I don't think so.
Good.Wouldn't mind another blast from Steyn after this.
Ha, Fat Gray following benchy on his Blackberry, IMHO.Wouldn't mind another blast from Steyn after this.
Morkel the fastest out there bowling 87/88mph, Steyn and Jimmy bowled around the same for the most part, shows what a team on top with a 200 odd lead can do .I'm certainly not of the opinion that pace is the be all and end all, but the Saffers have been appreciably faster here and have definitely flogged more life out of what was supposed to be the deadest duck of a deck.
Bell wears one from Morkel to prove my point; it's just good, hostile, fast stuff.
Or maybe this Saffer team are an awful lot better than we gave them credit for?Morkel the fastest out there bowling 87/88mph, Steyn and Jimmy bowled around the same for the most part, shows what a team on top with a 200 odd lead can do .
England just bowled really poor though, even taking the pitch into consideration, yesterday and today they just seemed to go through the motion, which is not what we've come to expect from them at all.
Makes you wonder whether they'll unleash big Steve, next time, maybe could have used him this test match.
Is that Julian Assange with Woy & the Gaffer?
Not taking anything away from the SA's and never have done, think they're a very good attack but I think we are too and we've proved it over again but there's no getting away from the fact England have bowled as poor as they have done in ages this test.Or maybe this Saffer team are an awful lot better than we gave them credit for?
I for one am guilty of that. Long unbeaten home run maybe got the better of me.
We did, lacked intensity like SA did on day 1 too which was unusual for both sides.Not taking anything away from the SA's and never have done, think they're a very good attack but I think we are too and they've proved it but there's no getting away from the fact England have bowled as poor as they have done in ages this test.
Just been a bit of a weird test match, hyped up as the best 2 bowling attacks going at it and for the most it's been the batsmen show, then the SA's decided to show up and we didn't.We did, lacked intensity like SA did on day 1 too which was unusual for both sides.