silentstriker
The Wheel is Forever
In my defence, it's a perfectly valid physiological fact as well.
A Spinner took more wickets than Warne in every format.What is the definition of chucker for these purposes?
Sorry, you smell of thick ****. McGrath and Pollock's names are mentioned because they were measured. If some others were measured and these two's name did appear, then they could have gone to the courts for defamation, and after half a decade, it has not happened. What ever your conspiracy theories are just in the dust bin. The FACT is McGrath and Pollock were measured at 12 degrees. Your attempts to twist technical English is just childish and moronic.they could have said anybody. It's all derived from a quote by Angus Fraser;
however you are deliberately misquoting to try to push a barrow. your attempted ambiguation is both childish and disingenuous. It does nothing to further understanding or adult discussion and should be discouraged.
Bending the rules on chucking - Cricket - www.smh.com.au
+1clearly the international batsmen don't have the benefit of your keen eye or your cricket experience (of 'watching it loads') to judge something like that.
no, I'm done with you until you prove it.Sorry, you smell of thick ****. McGrath and Pollock's names are mentioned because they were measured. If some others were measured and these two's name did appear, then they could have gone to the courts for defamation, and after half a decade, it has not happened. What ever your conspiracy theories are just in the dust bin. The FACT is McGrath and Pollock were measured at 12 degrees. Your attempts to twist technical English is just childish and moronic.
Stop pouting out garbage, and I've even given the full article link to see. McGrath's and Pollock's names doesn't come out of arses of people unless their footage was tested. Even the players themselves not deny the fact. Stop these child's play bull****. Simple fact is McGrath and Pollock chucked under old law. If you cannot digest the fact without resorting to playing Shakspear with the words, it's not my problem.no, I'm done with you until you prove it.
You deliberately chopped off a quote, from which I've provided the origin, which doesn't back up what you are saying.
liar.
the links I posted show the results, not just the abstract.In case anyone is interested in reading some scientific articles about this: An evaluation of biomechanical measures of bo... [Sports Biomech. 2007] - PubMed - NCBI
Fast bowling arm actions and the illegal deli... [Sports Biomech. 2006] - PubMed - NCBI
We found that bowlers generally bowled within a change in elbow extension angle of 15.5 degrees. However, this limit was unable to differentiate groups of bowlers from those who were suspected of throwing in the past. Improved differentiation was attained using the elbow extension angular velocity at ball release. The elbow extension angular velocity at ball release may be conceptually more valid than the elbow extension angle in determining which bowlers use the velocity-contributing mechanisms of a throw. Also, a high value of elbow extension angular velocity at ball release may be related to the visual impression of throwing. Therefore, it is recommended that researchers and cricket legislators examine the feasibility of specifying a limit to the elbow extension angular velocity at ball release to determine bowling legality.