AwtaTo have everyone in the batting position that suits them best, I'd go
1. Hutton
2. Mitchell
3, Walcott
4. Gower
5. Miller
6. Chanderpaul
7. Hussey
8. Mahmood
9. Laker
10. Bedser
11. Walsh
Slightly unconventional, but looks like it'd work to me.
Yeah, catching up with friends from Canberra that I haven't seen in ages. Lots of kids about....having a good Saturday?
Love your team KK. However, having a bloke at No.3 who can give the ball a tonking is important in my view. Hammond is a commanding player and therefore a perfect first drop.Had to add this man to the team : George Lohmann
CricZo XI
1. Matthew Hayden / ( 8625 @ 50.73 with 30 tons )
2. Graham Gooch / ( 8900 @ 42.58 with 20 tons )
3. Rahul Dravid / ( 13288 @ 52.31 with 36 tons )
4. Wally Hammond / o ( 7249 @ 58.45 with 22 tons; 83 @ 37.80 ) - 6
5. Kevin Pietersen / ( 6857 @ 49.33 with 20 tons )
6. Garry Sobers / o ( 8032 @ 57.78 with 26 tons; 235 @ 34.03 ) - 4
7. Rod Marsh + ( 3633 @ 26.51 with 3 tons; 355 dismissals )
8. Richie Benaud o / ( 2201 @ 24.45 with 3 tons; 248 wickets @ 27.03 ) - 5
9. Dale Steyn o ( 272 wickets @ 23.18 ) - 1
10. Wes Hall o ( 192 wickets @ 26.38 ) - 2
11. Neil Adcock o ( 104 wickets @ 21.10 ) - 3
12. George Lohmann o ( 112 wickets @ 10.75 )
That's right. A cracker of an innings.I take it you're referring to his 180 when Laxman made his 281?
Why Rahul Dravid is India?s greatest Test cricketer, bar noneThat's right. A cracker of an innings.
So will I get more votes if I change it to,That's right. A cracker of an innings.
The point of having an aggressive No.3 with 'presence' is that the batting side doesn't lose momentum or initiative just because an opener goes early. The feeling that the bowlers are 'on-top' shouldn't last for too long if the batting side can help it.But yeah Watson, that was a gem of a knock!
By the way I have a dominating opening pair and I'd love to see RD coming if we lose Gooch early. A dominating Haydos will need someone calm @ the other end. Correct me if I am wrong.