watson
Banned
I guess this is the key quote from that article;Why Rahul Dravid is India?s greatest Test cricketer, bar none
Agreed - you might find this interesting as well. IMO the 180 not his best but mighty close, and saying he's best suited to 6 for that reason seems wrong - I believe Bradman batted at 7 in arguably his finest innings.
3rd Test: Australia v England at Melbourne, Jan 1-7, 1937 | Cricket Scorecard | ESPN Cricinfo
Under closer inspection, Bradman's reversal of the batting order may not have seemed so funny to the Tiger seeing as he was out first ball to Voce
In the context of the Indian team I would have to agree with the author. However, KKs batting order doesn't need rescuing, saving, propping-up or defining. It is already defined as great. It's an ATG team.However, his ODI batting had one thing in common with his Test career. In both forms of the game, Dravid successfully absorbed more pressure than any batsman in the history of Indian cricket. In both forms of the game – this is utterly remarkable – no other country has had any batsman achieve this. Ultimately, this is also what defines Dravid’s legacy in Indian cricket, whatever the format. And, in Test cricket particularly, doing this from the pivotal number 3 position, changed the narrative of Indian cricket in the first part of the 2000s decade. It is a contribution that cannot be underestimated.
The only thing that KK has to consider is balance. I think that Dravid would enjoy batting at No.6. If his side is realing at 4-50 then he would feel right at home. And if they are 4-300 then he may appreciate being able to 'open his shoulders' and attack the bowling like we know he can do if ODIs are anything to go by.
There's also the psychological effect on opposing bowlers. After working hard all day to get rid of the middle-order the last person they would probably want to see emerging from the pavilion is R. Dravid. More hard work with no easy wickets.
Last edited: