• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

**Official** West Indies in England 2012

Manee

Cricketer Of The Year
Was wondering why people think that Bresnan bowls around 130kph in Tests despite bowling 140-145kph in ODIs. Regularly, the problem would be stamina related but England are physically trained so hard and well that the likes of Broad and Finn regularly touch 140kph in Test cricket and have stock speeds closer to around 135kph rather than 130kph like Bresnan. Doesn't seem like a lot of difference but Bresnan looked positively pedestrian in the Test and he has the potential to be very quick indeed.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Was wondering why people think that Bresnan bowls around 130kph in Tests despite bowling 140-145kph in ODIs. Regularly, the problem would be stamina related but England are physically trained so hard and well that the likes of Broad and Finn regularly touch 140kph in Test cricket and have stock speeds closer to around 135kph rather than 130kph like Bresnan. Doesn't seem like a lot of difference but Bresnan looked positively pedestrian in the Test and he has the potential to be very quick indeed.
Bresnan bowled a fair bit quicker in Tests between his Ashes recall and his injury; I think it's just a match fitness/rhythm thing than a Tests/ODIs thing.
 

NasserFan207

International Vice-Captain
Bresnan bowled fine against the Windies. Was just fairly unlucky I thought. His one bad spell came in the 2nd innings when Sammy took him apart a bit.
 

uvelocity

International Coach
Yeah, but that's what I'm questioning. How have they determined he has the ability to play well in Tests when all we've seen from him are brutal 50s with violent sixes. I just don't know how that conclusion can be reached on the available evidence.
because like benchmark said to begin with hitting the ball is hitting the ball. If you're good at it, you're good at it. Making the game longer if anything old allows him to score more runs.
 

wellAlbidarned

International Coach
To be honest, it doesn't really matter does it? WI seem to have pigeon-holed him as a LO player and I doubt we'll ever see him in a Test match. I think he prefers it that way as well.
Nah, he's done that himself. Hasn't played a FC game in ages. If he did, then I doubt the selectors would ignore him for long.
 

benchmark00

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Yeah as others have said.

Warner is the classic example isn't it? He couldn't get a gig at FC level with NSW because he was pigeon holed as a big hitting t20 player who could only hit boundaries. Although it's true that he does hit boundaries well, you find that because of that ability opposition captains push the field back a bit which opens up the opportunity to pick up singles. There's not reason why Pollard couldn't do the same. Yeah I rate Warner's technique a little better than Pollard maybe, but only maybe. Pollard isn't a slogger, he can just hit straight and long, and uses that ability alot.

If Pollard never plays a test then the Windies have missed a big opportunity.
 

benchmark00

Request Your Custom Title Now!
But this is what I said earlier. Windies should put more resources into getting him to play tests.

I think I read somewhere that Pollard isn't against the idea of playing test cricket at all.
 

Cabinet96

Hall of Fame Member
I think if he got selected for the test team he wouldn't refuse, but it's about whether he's willing to play a lot of FC cricket in the West Indies to prove that he should be in the team.
 

Jacknife

International Captain
Was wondering why people think that Bresnan bowls around 130kph in Tests despite bowling 140-145kph in ODIs. Regularly, the problem would be stamina related but England are physically trained so hard and well that the likes of Broad and Finn regularly touch 140kph in Test cricket and have stock speeds closer to around 135kph rather than 130kph like Bresnan. Doesn't seem like a lot of difference but Bresnan looked positively pedestrian in the Test and he has the potential to be very quick indeed.
He normally bowls in every other test match between 85-88mph consistently, he's usually been the quickest of the England bowlers since Broad's become a bit more line and length. I think as someone else mentioned he's taking time getting back up to top pace after his injury. Saying that most of his spells weren't that down on pace, he might have had the odd ball around 80mph but he was mostly around 83mph, funny enough Broad in that first innings dropped well down into the 70's on a few occasions which was a bit strange.
 

Scaly piscine

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I think he would if the price was right...


That's one hell of a long, well tanned left arm he's got.

My issue with Pollard would be he just looks absolutely clueless at times in the IPL, then he gets out or gets to face a different bowler. I think that would take a lot of work before he could bat something like a Flintoff say - which would be good enough to be a fixture in this WI side. I don't see his bowling being a factor unless he's hiding his ability to move it off the straight, so he'd have to get in as a batsman.
 

Top