30 minutes of intense cricket is a fair amount in isolation, especially when there's enough errors in that time to count on two hands. On the premise itself, I think NZ/Aus & SA are easily the 3 best fielding sides in the world, do you disagree?don't make daft sweeping generalisations based on just a handful of overs in a ridiculously tense scenario, then.
SL have been the best fielding side in this series by a mile.Nah, his "daft sweeping generalisation" was pretty spot on, tbh.
Still behind RSA and NZ, imo.SL have been the best fielding side in this series by a mile.
Alright well then I'll cherrypick the previous 30 minutes of fielding from SL, compare it to last Sunday and say that SL are so much better a fielding side than Australia it's not even worth talking about and it'd be equally stupid.30 minutes of intense cricket is a fair amount in isolation, especially when there's enough errors in that time to count on two hands. On the premise itself, I think NZ/Aus & SA are easily the 3 best fielding sides in the world, do you disagree?
Cherry-picking aside, I just asked you a fairly simple question. Are you uncomfortable answering it or something?Alright well then I'll cherrypick the previous 30 minutes of fielding from SL, compare it to last Sunday and say that SL are so much better a fielding side than Australia it's not even worth talking about and it'd be equally stupid.
Pollard > any fielder from those 3 sides. WI might be as good as NZ if not slightly better.30 minutes of intense cricket is a fair amount in isolation, especially when there's enough errors in that time to count on two hands. On the premise itself, I think NZ/Aus & SA are easily the 3 best fielding sides in the world, do you disagree?
They obviously have a fair bit of work on their under-pressure fielding then.Amazed people are complaining about the standard of SL fielding when it was the main reason this match was remotely close. Yeah they ****ed up a bit towards the end, pressure does that.
Wasn't aware that meant I wasn't allowed to state my opinion.They obviously have a fair bit of work on their under-pressure fielding then.
Jeez, calm the **** down. You're a moderator ffs.
This ain't nothing compared to a PEWS rant ****. Pipe down.Jeez, calm the **** down. You're a moderator ffs.
Sub-continent fielding is still a long way off Aust/NZ & SA standard, must be said.Cherry-picking aside, I just asked you a fairly simple question. Are you uncomfortable answering it or something?
Oh, so moderators should be so aggressive towards posters?Wasn't aware that meant I wasn't allowed to state my opinion.
Pollard over Guptill? You havin a larf?Pollard > any fielder from those 3 sides. WI might be as good as NZ if not slightly better.
the longer the cricket match the betterHope the past three games indicate to the general public that no amount of T20 slap, tickle an bash can surpass a competitive, well-fought one dayer
WI were pretty awesome the last 30 minutes I saw them field in a game, clearly better than NZ going by your logic. And yeah Pollard is better than Guptill.Pollard over Guptill? You havin a larf?
WI's aren't nearly as consistent as NZ in the field. Crazy thing to say.
What are they all on about?30.1
Perera to Dhoni, 1 run, 137.7 kph, Dropped Dhoni spoons it hard back to the bowler's ;left and Perera stretches out his hand and fails to hang on
30.2
Perera to Gambhir, no run, 135.0 kph, tries to steer it behind the wicket but can't get it past short third man
30.3
Perera to Gambhir, 1 run, 141.3 kph, gets a bit of width and he opens the face of the bat and angles it down to deep point
30.4
Perera to Dhoni, no run, 138.2 kph, words can't describe Dhoni's technique here! Stood at the crease and poked his bat forward and squirted out a full delivery, nearly lost balance after playing the shot
30.5
Perera to Dhoni, no run, 133.0 kph, he watchfully leaves it alone to the keeper
30.6
Perera to Dhoni, no run, 137.8 kph, thumps it straight to short cover, rooted to the crease, typical Dhoni