That was ONE article and it didn't say what you're saying it said. The headline, as sadly so often happens with the UK press - the journalists and columnists who write the articles are never responsible for the headlines -, deliberately misrepresented the article's slant in order to attract readers' attention.Eng bowlers have applied themselves well considering these surfaces, but I have to at some of the articles coming out of Eng media about Anderson & Broad being as good as McGrath + Gillespie suddenly... or Graeme Swann claiming Broad's now the best bowler in the world. But then they are *special* friends aren't they
Edit: Also, another gem was Swann coming up with "it's bad luck that I have to bowl to right handers" as an excuse last night. Gold
The writer of the article itself, if you'd bothered to read it, expressly made the point that he was NOT claiming they were as good as McGrath & Gillespie, but rather was interested in highlighting similarities in the two new ball pairings' modus operandi.
Before LOLing at "articles coming out of Eng media" you'd do well to actually read said articles, not just the headlines.
Btw, friendly warning: cheap shots about "*special* friends" just make you look like a ******.