Yeah ditto.Unlucky in terms of the keeping, but Ajmal's still got him reaching so far out in front of his body because he's not sure what the ball is going to do.
Again, still think Bell has only one answer to quality spin.
Obviously.So should KP.
Hmm, would have had to have been some very quick work, natural give in the hands would've given him the extra second to get back in IMO in 99% of cases.Don't know how you can say Bell was unlucky. Akmal lucky perhaps, but Bell played a poor shot, should've been stumped by a good keeper.
Nah don't agree with that.Hmm, would have had to have been some very quick work, natural give in the hands would've given him the extra second to get back in IMO in 99% of cases.
Surely at three down and only 25 or so behind, this is time for a more positive approach? I know it isn't easy, but if you take this approach you'll go anyway. If those two took them on for four or five overs, it might induce a change and ye partnership can develop.Bell 3* from 25.
This won't end well.
He has arguably the best footwork of our top order too, so a bit of positivity might be the go.
That someone being KP. Proper ****.Someone just doesn't want KP to score runs.
I was saying unlucky as he gifted the opportunity which the keeper didn't take and then Pakistan got lucky.Don't know how you can say Bell was unlucky. Akmal lucky perhaps, but Bell played a poor shot, should've been stumped by a good keeper.