Zinzan
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Only because he stole Shane Bond's faceJarvis is a pretty classy bowler.
Only because he stole Shane Bond's faceJarvis is a pretty classy bowler.
Yeah, saw that on the replay of the dropped catch.Watling still needs to work on keeping his bat straight in his follow through, too often it comes through crooked. If he can iron out that technical deficiency there's good sign for him.
Na mate the two frames we had were the bat was behind the line and the bails hadn't moved, and then the bat was an inch over the line and the stumps were bent. You can't give that out and it actually seemed likely he would have made the ground if we had a better camera on it.wtf, that was clearly out. Outrageous. If the stumps are all bent over that means the bails are dislodged, people.
The first of the two frames Taibu has clearly hit the stumps, the stumps and bails have all moved and Watling is short. Just because the image is a bit blurry doesn't mean you should ignore the obvious. A clearer front-on image would obviously have shown that the bails don't magically adhere to the stumps while the stumps move.Na mate the two frames we had were the bat was behind the line and the bails hadn't moved, and then the bat was an inch over the line and the stumps were bent. You can't give that out and it actually seemed likely he would have made the ground if we had a better camera on it.
There was an even worse run out not given last night in Pak-Eng. Definitely thought that one was out.
On the line = out. It was pretty clear at the time.On the other hand I don't get how Vettori was given out, it appeared that when the bails were dislodged his foot was right at the back of the line, surely too close to call? Didn't get as many views of that one though. In this case Watling was deadset 6 inches short and we just didn't have the right frame (well, we did imo, but umpires apparently need to see bails a foot from the stumps before they consider them dislodged).