And the only memory of Hughes I have is of a fat man with a huge moustache running in to bowl. Don't remember how fast or how good he was.
To my young eyes, he seemed quite similar to David Boon in appearance.
He was a fair bit taller, but they were a bit alike. Was the tail end of the era of the 'tache. Merv started off as a joke really. He came in in 85-86 when Lawson was diagnosed with stress fractures. he sprayed the ball everywhere and could not hold a bat. After he'd played three tests he was asked his ambition and replied "to score a test run".
After the Ashes series in 86-87 Ian Chappell described him as a joke and an embarrassment. Hughes, iirc, was out of the side for a little while bu when the Windies toured in 88-89 he came back and trimmed down enormously. Bloke was fit as.
In the first test or second test of that series in Perth, Lawson had his jaw broken by Ambrose and Hughes had to carry the attack. I think he got five in the first innings, and with the first ball of the second took a hat trick by getting Greenidge lbw. He took 8 fer in that innings and basically never looked back really. Benaud said that was the standard he had to bowl to - not results wise, but the level he bowled at.
He was third seamer behind Lawson and Alderman on the 89 Ashes tour, but bowled ok (not great). He was pretty much a mainstay from that point on until the 93 Ashes tour where he basically bowled himself into retirement on a dodgy knee. Took 34 wickets that series.
He was very aggressive. I recall he was more a seam bowler han a swing bowler, but he could get alarming bounce at times. When he came back in his second incarnation he was a lot more consistent and was pretty well capable of troubling most anyone.
He enjoyed roughing blokes up. Tortured Hick in 93. I think it was to Hick wh he said "How about I bowl you a piano? Maybe you can play that you ****ing Pommie ****". Liked a sledge.
Also worked hard on his batting. Went from complete bunny to taking the 88-89 Windies attack for 80 odd at Adelaide, and made a 70 odd in a test in England too. I think he was much under rated. 200 plus wickets at a decent average. He and McDermott (and to a lesser extent Reid) kind of filled the gap between the Lillee and McGrath eras.
Those are my memories of him.