• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

How fast were Merv Hughes and Craig Mcdermott in 1991/92 series vs India

weldone

Hall of Fame Member
Yeah must be that fast, otherwise a 17-year old should have scored more than 2 centuries.

Edit: In before Spark's strict moderation :p
 

vic_orthdox

Global Moderator
Neither of the blokes were renowned for being super quick. Reckon they would have operated mainly in the mid 130s, and pushing above 140 when they were in good rhythm.
 

weldone

Hall of Fame Member
On a serious note, from whatever little memory I have of the series, my estimate of McDermott's speed would be around 140 kmph.
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Neither of the blokes were renowned for being super quick. Reckon they would have operated mainly in the mid 130s, and pushing above 140 when they were in good rhythm.
Healy said Hughes bowled consistently faster than anyone else he kept to, fwiw.
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Yeah must be that fast, otherwise a 17-year old should have scored more than 2 centuries.

Edit: In before Spark's strict moderation :p
The other day, an Indian supporter in the tour thread mentioned how people from that part of the world don't do satire at all well (GI Joe excepted I think the call was).

I hadn't given it a lot of thought before, but they may have been right.
 

weldone

Hall of Fame Member
The other day, an Indian supporter in the tour thread mentioned how people from that part of the world don't do satire at all well (GI Joe excepted I think the call was).

I hadn't given it a lot of thought before, but they may have been right.
Nah that was truth. Satire was the 5th post of the thread.
 

zaremba

Cricketer Of The Year
I'd say Hughes was capable of bowling really quite quick. He was easy to under-rate because he was such a ridiculous figure and looked so unathletic, but he was capable of bowling pretty fast - 90mph at a guess, or, in French, 145 kph. That's not to say he was always up there, of course.
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I'd say Hughes was capable of bowling really quite quick. He was easy to under-rate because he was such a ridiculous figure and looked so unathletic, but he was capable of bowling pretty fast - 90mph at a guess, or, in French, 145 kph. That's not to say he was always up there, of course.
Think Mervyn bowled something of a "heavy ball", as befitted his frame.
 

fredfertang

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Had the most ridiculous mincing run up did Merv, not helped by that silly facial hair that made him look like one of the Village People - useful bowler nonetheless
 

weldone

Hall of Fame Member
On a serious note, from whatever little memory I have of the series, my estimate of McDermott's speed would be around 140 kmph.
And the only memory of Hughes I have is of a fat man with a huge moustache running in to bowl. Don't remember how fast or how good he was.

To my young eyes, he seemed quite similar to David Boon in appearance.
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
And the only memory of Hughes I have is of a fat man with a huge moustache running in to bowl. Don't remember how fast or how good he was.

To my young eyes, he seemed quite similar to David Boon in appearance.
He was a fair bit taller, but they were a bit alike. Was the tail end of the era of the 'tache. Merv started off as a joke really. He came in in 85-86 when Lawson was diagnosed with stress fractures. he sprayed the ball everywhere and could not hold a bat. After he'd played three tests he was asked his ambition and replied "to score a test run".

After the Ashes series in 86-87 Ian Chappell described him as a joke and an embarrassment. Hughes, iirc, was out of the side for a little while bu when the Windies toured in 88-89 he came back and trimmed down enormously. Bloke was fit as.

In the first test or second test of that series in Perth, Lawson had his jaw broken by Ambrose and Hughes had to carry the attack. I think he got five in the first innings, and with the first ball of the second took a hat trick by getting Greenidge lbw. He took 8 fer in that innings and basically never looked back really. Benaud said that was the standard he had to bowl to - not results wise, but the level he bowled at.

He was third seamer behind Lawson and Alderman on the 89 Ashes tour, but bowled ok (not great). He was pretty much a mainstay from that point on until the 93 Ashes tour where he basically bowled himself into retirement on a dodgy knee. Took 34 wickets that series.

He was very aggressive. I recall he was more a seam bowler han a swing bowler, but he could get alarming bounce at times. When he came back in his second incarnation he was a lot more consistent and was pretty well capable of troubling most anyone.

He enjoyed roughing blokes up. Tortured Hick in 93. I think it was to Hick wh he said "How about I bowl you a piano? Maybe you can play that you ****ing Pommie ****". Liked a sledge.

Also worked hard on his batting. Went from complete bunny to taking the 88-89 Windies attack for 80 odd at Adelaide, and made a 70 odd in a test in England too. I think he was much under rated. 200 plus wickets at a decent average. He and McDermott (and to a lesser extent Reid) kind of filled the gap between the Lillee and McGrath eras.

Those are my memories of him.
 
Last edited:

weldone

Hall of Fame Member
Remember Paul Reiffel and another guy (forgot the name) were the other fast bowlers on that tour...my first memories of a test series, and my first memories of my childhood hero Tendulkar...
 

Top