How about a (semi)preview from Hussain?I'm so excited for England playing Tests again that I keep going onto Cricinfo to see if they've put up a preview yet, even though I have no real interest in reading it. I'm not well.
Rabindra Mehta, a NASA Scientist, who had studied cricket-ball aerodynamics for decades has lectured ECB coaches (including Troy Cooley) on his findings:Who taught Cooley?
Obviously Troy Cooley taught the players but the question was who "taught" Cooley. Cooley initially got the information and data from Rabindra Mehta and then using this information, he started working with the players.That was just one lecture. And he is a scientist. He wouldn't be practising reverse swing with the players.
On first take read that as if Cook's balls don't sweat...Also Cook is ball polisher as he doesn't sweat, that supposedly helps it happen.
It was probably pretty harsh but tbh he just wasn't very good. A better question would be how he managed to get picked in the first place, or how he managed to get the figures he did.Why was Tanvir Ahmed dropped? I know he doesn't fit the typical Pakistani quick bowler mould but he did do a good job, especially on the roads against SA.
Think he was picked because Pakistan at that time didn't want to gamble with newcomers and wanted a steady bowler, someone who had been performing domestically for a long time and someone with a lot of experience. He seemed alright to me, wasn't too quick obviously, though I remember him hurrying the SA batsmen quite a bit. Bowled a pretty good ball to get rid of Amla (or one of the openers), cut back in nicely. It was harsh to drop him imo, he did nothing wrong.It was probably pretty harsh but tbh he just wasn't very good. A better question would be how he managed to get picked in the first place, or how he managed to get the figures he did.
Well I dispute that he'd been performing domestically for a long time, really - averaging 28 or so in the QEA Trophy is really nothing to write home about. He was picked ahead of several more "deserved" domestic players, one of which was Cheema, and the error was rectified. The dropping was harsh but the original selection was generous.Think he was picked because Pakistan at that time didn't want to gamble with newcomers and wanted a steady bowler, someone who had been performing domestically for a long time and someone with a lot of experience. He seemed alright to me, wasn't too quick obviously, though I remember him hurrying the SA batsmen quite a bit. Bowled a pretty good ball to get rid of Amla (or one of the openers), cut back in nicely. It was harsh to drop him imo, he did nothing wrong.
Right, I didn't know his domestic stats that well, I was wrong about that. Just looked them up and he took 97 wickets at 20 in 09/10, guess that's what prompted the selectors. I don't know the breakdown of that between the QEA and the Pentangular cup though.Well I dispute that he'd been performing domestically for a long time, really - averaging 28 or so in the QEA Trophy is really nothing to write home about. He was picked ahead of several more "deserved" domestic players, one of which was Cheema, and the error was rectified. The dropping was harsh but the original selection was generous.
Yeah he was a slightly above average seamer for ages, then he had a good season at the right time and it threw him into the side really. I think you could say the same about Wahab to a large extent as well though. He wasn't awful and he performed to the most of his ability but it's no disgrace he's not in the frame when Gul, Cheema are Junaid are there.Right, I didn't know his domestic stats that well, I was wrong about that. Just looked them up and he took 97 wickets at 20 in 09/10, guess that's what prompted the selectors. I don't know the breakdown of that between the QEA and the Pentangular cup though.
Bell injured now!Pakistan v England 2011-12: England's first blow is self-inflicted | Cricket News | Pakistan v England | ESPN Cricinfo
England doing everything they can to give Pakistan a chance
Its not just the English bowlers..many bowlers around the world have picked up on it..and mostly it is a case of necessity like it was with Pakistani bowlers..when you are bowling on flat decks and get nothing from the pitch, you have no option but to try out different things and as they say, necessity is the mother of invention.I was being serious in the question. How did they all suddenly become experts in reverse swing? Who taught them reverse swing?