***Official*** India in Australia 2011/12

[wellAlbidarned]

Hawkeye shows it missing, commentators don't mention it? Idiots.

 

[stephen]

Would have love that LBW to be turned down.

With the DRS it would have been umpire's call, but boy it looked bad in real time. Not playing a shot always hurts the batsman's chances.

 

[Pothas]

give us a replay ffs!

Best leaver but Oh dear ! disappointed ffffs

That's just the way he plays

 

[Contra]

Hawkeye showing its missing but that was defo hitting when u look at the close in reply, interesting stuff.

 

[Redbacks]

He tried not to hit it, and succeeded in that regard.

1st up I thought it was missing. It's his own fault for not offering a shot for a ball that close.

 

[BoyBrumby]

Eagle eye has it missing. Interesting.

My finger would've been up, tbh.

 

[hazsa19]

Can't give that not-out

 

[Sylvester]

Which hawk-eye are you guys watching? It was clipping which would have been given under DRS.

 

[Spikey]

That's just the way he plays

Already made that joke tbh

 

[Redbacks]

Hawkeye shows it missing, commentators don't mention it? Idiots.

would have been umpires call, and it was clipping the stumps anyway

 

[Kylez]

That definitely wasn't a plumb LBW. Even initially I thought it was close to missing the off-stump.

 

[Burgey]

Hawkeye shows it missing, commentators don't mention it? Idiots.

No it said hitting, or umpires' call, didn't it?

 

[benchmark00]

Hawkeye showing its missing but that was defo hitting when u look at the close in reply, interesting stuff.

Channel 9 Eagle Eye saying hitting.

And one wonders why the BCCI aren't sold...

 

[Contra]

That's REALLY interesting that close in reply, because Hawk eye's path is taken after Cowan's leg leans forward, even though the ball hit him well before the moved his leg.

 

[Top_Cat]

Which hawk-eye are you guys watching? It was clipping which would have been given under DRS.

Yeah, that's the replay I saw. If referred, was still out.

 

[Contra]

Channel 9 Eagle Eye saying hitting.

And one wonders why the BCCI aren't sold...

Whoops it shows missing on Star as well. But my point is that on close in reply that was hitting for mine.

 

[R_D]

Hawkeye showing its missing but that was defo hitting when u look at the close in reply, interesting stuff.

Yeah there is defiantly something wrong with this eagle eye thing... Looked a lot more closer on replay but the prediction thing showing the ball hitting the top of off stump

 

[wellAlbidarned]

would have been umpires call, and it was clipping the stumps anyway

Yeah didn't look closely enough. Still, I'd say it's worth a bit of discussion considering how they were all calling it totally plumb five seconds earlier.

 

[BoyBrumby]

Which hawk-eye are you guys watching? It was clipping which would have been given under DRS.

I'm watching Star Cricket's feed/comm. Theirs showed it missing Cowan's off peg.

 

[KiWiNiNjA]

Can't give that not-out

This.

Although these umps have already missed a couple of plumb LBWs