No it doesn't?Hawkeye shows it missing
Thread moving at 100 posts per second tbfAlready made that joke tbh
Nah it's just clipping, I thought it was missing at first too.I'm watching Star Cricket's feed/comm. Theirs showed it missing Cowan's off peg.
Eagle eye > Human eyeWhoops it shows missing on Star as well. But my point is that on close in reply that was hitting for mine.
Watching a crappy subcontinental stream, they don't say whether it's hitting or not. On second look yeah it's just clipping off.No it doesn't?
Showed it clipping off; would've stayed as on-field call and out if reviewed (if it could have been; that is).
Always looks plumber than it actually is when the batsman doesn't offer a shot; he tends to lose the benefit of the doubt in everyone's eyes when that happens. It was legitimately close.Yeah didn't look closely enough. Still, I'd say it's worth a bit of discussion considering how they were all calling it totally plumb five seconds earlier.
can't really expect two techs to be exactly the same unless they are using the exact same prediction algorithm.Channel 9 Eagle Eye saying hitting.
And one wonders why the BCCI aren't sold...