Burgey
Request Your Custom Title Now!
He has five months to think about it. Confirmed out for the summer.He should just stop doing that ridiculous sling-shot action. That alone might fix many things.
He has five months to think about it. Confirmed out for the summer.He should just stop doing that ridiculous sling-shot action. That alone might fix many things.
I'm not rejoicing yet. It depends on:a Christmas miracle!
Well I said this earlier in the thread:Everyone who was thinking this could prove beneficial to Australia during the test series with India still believe this?
Not being a smartarse, genuinely curious whether people would prefer Starc, Hilfenhaus etc.
At this point I'd be happy to see the back of Johnson if it meant Australia were looking at building a balanced attack with included Copeland or Butterworth ... or even if Bollinger, Harris and Cameron were all going to fit regularly, but I'd sooner have Johnson than Cutting, Starc or Pattinson. He will be a loss if those are his only potential replacements, IMO.
I'll have $100 on it being his heart.literally can't wait to find out what the hell is in his toe
To be honest mate, I'm that tired of seeing Johnson bowl **** I'd rather we spent some time trying all the other options first. Purely for my own sanity.Everyone who was thinking this could prove beneficial to Australia during the test series with India still believe this?
Not being a smartarse, genuinely curious whether people would prefer Starc, Hilfenhaus etc.
Tbf, since McDermott became bowling coach the attack hasn't done too much wrong, save the second innings in Cape Town.I would have Cutting ahead of Johnson in a heartbeat. Starc doesn't have the benefit of several years in the test side to work on his deficiencies with the so-called 'best' coaching we have available so it's unfair to compare him with Johnson or Siddle right now. It's a bit sad that we are considering Johnson and Starc in the same breath really considering how long Johnson has had in the side to get things right.