LOL, well, I haven't followed his FC career but doing those things in Tests are his problem. What I meant with why I think the selectors keep picking him is they expect him to pick up on those things pretty fast, yet it is evident he doesn't.ha ha.
If he could do all those things for 4 consective FC matches then that would be a decent start.
Those are some major, major changes, friend. For starters, that better seam position thing would change his release position drastically and would screw up his bowling rhythm even more.I think the tempting thing with Johnson is that I don't think he needs major changes. If he can get a better seam position, more consistency with line and length; learn to contain, etc he can be a very good bowler.
Sreesanth HAS a better seam position, FFS! He is just that **** that he can still mess it up...Those are some major, major changes, friend. For starters, that better seam position thing would change his release position drastically and would screw up his bowling rhythm even more.
What you described there are the fundamental building blocks of pace bowling. If every bowler could do that well enough, there'd be nothing to seperate men like Trueman, Lillee and Hadlee from the Johnsons , the Siddles and the Sreesanths of the world!
Siddle?I see it as Dougie and Harris being the auto selections when fit and cummins\starc\pattinson\copeland as the guys who fight for the last spot and replace anyone who's injured.
Same position as the young bowlers there was a replacement. I like Siddle and he's one of my favourites when i watch him play for the bushrangers but most of the time I just can't stop having the feeling that there is better bowlers we can be picking over him. This test we need him though, we need some experience and he does have the right attitude to lead an attack and try to scare the batsman which is something we really do lack these days. When Johnson tries intimidation half the time he reminds of a little rich kid playing at being a rebel.Siddle?
I'd take Copeland, Pattinson and Cummins over him. Agree on Starc and Cutting their more they'd be more then on potential for me.Well I certainly don't think Pattinson, Starc or Cutting are better than Siddle, tbh.
lolno.I see it as Dougie and Harris being the auto selections when fit and cummins\starc\pattinson\copeland as the guys who fight for the last spot and replace anyone who's injured.
This.tbh, the biggest (mis)assumption is that Johnson's bowling hasn't changed over the past two years and he's just been figured out. Reject that categorically, if there's one thing which has been constant in bowling it's been change. I mean that in terms of action, seam position, movement, the works. He's tried to bowl as a shock bowler, a stock bowler, a back-of-a-length nip each-way bowler, a swing bowler, etc. Was a better bowler when he could only do a couple of things but did them really well.
When was the last time we saw him nick someone out like he used to do regularly to Dravid? His length's gone south and with it the uncertainty the batsmen had about whether to play or not. Big outswingers used to be his MO. I cringe every time I see him try bowling around the wicket, says to me (and, I'm sure, the oppo) that he's just not sure how he's going to get to the crease, let alone where to put the ball once he gets there.
He should just stop doing that ridiculous sling-shot action. That alone might fix many things.This.
And it's made worse for Johnson because his action isn't repeatable at the best of times, even when he's just trying to do the one thing, let alone when he changes run up, decides to swing it, bowl fast, hit the pitch occasionally or whatever.