No, I didn't say it was a bad match, obviously it was far from that. What I mean though is that just because the match is extremely close doesn't neccesarily make ita great game from the standard point of view.
Oi!
If NZ can win one on Australian soil, then we can win a SERIES at home, let alone a "test match"
.
.
Lol its the exact same thing I thought of. Reminded me of Kent Brockman immediately when I saw Warner won MOM.
Called it.
Agreed, bar Waner the batting was diabolical from both sides to be honest, Aus was making the NZ attack look like Steyn and co!!!.
Less wickets given away in this match than at Brisbane. I, for one, was glad to see a game where the bowlers were on top for a change. Warner played a great counter-attacking knock by the sounds of things and there was some spicy bowling. Much better fielding too. I think you're a batting addict.
Warner
Yep, and I have to admit was wrong to bag Southee earlier today - bowled very well after lunch.
How long can the old boy last though?
There's more to the game than batting. Sure it was a helpful pitch, but the kiwi bowler's were superb in making the most of it. Siddle and Pattinson at times were also great. Catching generally was very good also.
Lol, You should have asked someone to take a photo, would have liked to have seen that**** YES!!! Dougeh you beast! Watched the rest standing outside a pub like a hobo, **** being underage.
Outstanding.Called it.
tbf he was our best in the two series before that by some margin. Deserves to be safe for now, but if he does nothing against the Indians then his spot to the Windies should be under severe pressure.
