Oooooookay, lets not go crazy. First of all, you need a stronger emphasis on that "if". Secondly, lets keep in mind who he's doing this against.I suppose his first innings efforts could be put down to nerves. One spell doesn't maketh the man but if he can produce that sort of bowling consistently Australia have a dangerous strike bowler to rival Steyn.
YepSo to all the Copeland fans, do you still think the new selectors were wrong for picking this XI?
Or should the attack have been Pattinson, Copeland and Siddle?
Isn't that what the majority of us were picking?So to all the Copeland fans, do you still think the new selectors were wrong for picking this XI?
Or should the attack have been Pattinson, Copeland and Siddle?
Because your batsmen are ****.Makes you wonder how on earth we were 9/21,
Yeah it's understandable to be nervous on debut for sure. I only saw the highlights on the first two days, so I'm not going to say that he was definitely rubbish, because I didn't see his entire spells.I suppose his first innings efforts could be put down to nerves. One spell doesn't maketh the man but if he can produce that sort of bowling consistently Australia have a dangerous strike bowler to rival Steyn.
He's always had this sort of stuff in him, but he just hasn't been consistent. Very surprised he's worked it out so quick, but pleasantly so. We still have Hazelwood yet to get a go who will be a superstar. Then of course Cummins and other very handy guys. We might not be fielding the best pace attack in the world by the next Ashes, but we won't be far off.
Over-reaction much?I suppose his first innings efforts could be put down to nerves. One spell doesn't maketh the man but if he can produce that sort of bowling consistently Australia have a dangerous strike bowler to rival Steyn.
Definitely Copes over Starc. The must have a lefty fetish is silly.So to all the Copeland fans, do you still think the new selectors were wrong for picking this XI?
Or should the attack have been Pattinson, Copeland and Siddle?
No chance brah, what's the odds on us being bowled out below 100 does it say ?Just put some money on New Zealand to make 200. Banking on Jesse to see off the new ball and then Danny to get us through.
A great spell is a great spell. Poor bowlers can produce the goods now and again but given his age and what he's displayed there's a lot to work with and a lot of potential.Oooooookay, lets not go crazy. First of all, you need a stronger emphasis on that "if". Secondly, lets keep in mind who he's doing this against.
It's certainly good bowling though.